As was to be expected the Press have gone well and truly over the top with their reporting on the death of Philip, the Duck of Edinburgh.
Course if that wasn’t bad enough, the fact that ALL of the old bollox now being published is nothing more than blatant propaganda & lies is a huge stain on the worlds media.
However, the press have no other choice than to make up lies about the Duck in order to make him look good, because in truth he was without doubt one of the most evil old bastards ever to walk this earth.
And with that in mind I have to say that I strongly object to the Monkey Press telling me that I am mourning for the perverted old cunt.
Furthermore it would appear that I am far from alone in that view since I have seen very little sympathy for the Royal family on social media.
In fact, on the day that the Duck died the BBC received more complaints that it had ever had in its entire history after dropping their normal program schedule in favour of back to back programs about Philip’s life.
Course, having said that I am sure that there will be thousands upon thousands of brain dead morons shedding a tear for him despite never having so much as met or clapped eyes on the Satanic parasite.
Yet what those daft cunts fail to understand is the fact that Philip and the rest of the Royal scum despise us all.
So, with that in mind let me rip to shreds some of the propaganda that is being published.
For instance the Monkey-Kuntz at the Daily Chimpanzee told us on April 9th (the day Philip allegedly died) that “heartbroken” Sweaty Betty would not be carrying out any Royal “Duties” for at least 8 days.
Which to be fair is not all that long a period of mourning at all, especially given the fact that Phil & Liz had been a couple for nigh on 82 years.
That is to say Phil first laid the groundwork to get into the Liz’s knickers 82 years ago – when she was just 13 years old; despite him being an 18 yr old playboy at the time:
Although the nation mourns the death of Prince Philip, it’s his family who must be feeling it the hardest.
And more than anyone his wife the Queen.
They were married for 73 years, making Philip the longest serving royal consort ever.
They’ve been together ever since, through ups and downs in a coupling built on love.
All of that, the 73 years of marriage and sharing the responsibiltiy of the monarchy, all came from one moment, in 1939, when the young Elizabeth fell in love with a dashing young naval student... Source
However I am getting ahead of myself, because despite the Chimp seemingly forgetting about their farticle claiming that Bizzy Lizzy would not be carrying out any official duties for at least the 8 days of mourning; it would appear that she thought “Fuck that” because just 3 short days later the broken hearted, 94 yr old Monarch was back at “work“:
Hmmm… A bit different then from the 40 years that Liz’s Great, Great Grandmother, the half-German, Queen Victoria spent in mourning following the death of her full German husband Prince Albert.
It is also worth pointing out that when the German speaking Victoria married her Cousin, the German speaking Prince Albert, the British Monarchy then ceased to exist by becoming the House of Saxe–Coburg and Gotha – A German Dynasty.
Indeed, that fact remains true to this day despite Queen Sticky Vicky’s grandson, King George V – who was married to the German, Queen Mary -changing the family name to Windsor in 1917.
However, that was only a purely cosmetic move and done so out of a need for self preservation because there was a good deal of anti-German sentiment in Britain before the First World War which then became almost hysterical after 1916 – in fact the author H.G Wells publicly accused the Family of being a “kingly caste of Germans” shortly before the 1917 name change.
And trust me, this wholly corrupt & dysfunctional family will do absolutely anything to save their worthless necks.
I mean anyone can change their name but doing so does not change who you really are… Indeed, the Royal Family are German through and through and in this article I will prove to you where their loyalties really lay.
However, before I go any further I will remind you that I have been telling my readers for years that the Third Reich formed the blueprint for what the monster-elite have in mind for us – a plan that the Royal Family are only to happy to participate in to achieve that goal.
Nevertheless, with the name-changing King George V being the grandson of Sticky Vicky, you also have to bear in mind that so was our German opponent in the first world war, Kaiser Wilhelm II… And don’t even get me started on the Russian branch of the family – to whom Philip is very closely related!
PHOTO: It’s hard to tell them apart isn’t it?
Now, our present Queen, Bizzy Lizzy and her husband Phil the Duck are both the great, great grandchildren of Queen Sticky Vicky. Or put another way, Liz & Phil are 2nd cousins once removed.
Course, Philip (fluent in German) is mainly bred from German stock. His real name is Philippos (Greek) and he did not become a British citizen until 1947 at the age of 26.
And thanks to centuries of inbreeding, the Royal gene pool is that contaminated that madness and genetic problems are common place within the family.
Indeed, King George III was as mad as a fucking hatter and Sticky Vicky herself was a Haemophiliac – which she passed on and resulted in the death of her son Prince Leopold at the tender age of 30.
Moreover, The Duck’s own mother – Slack Alice of Battenburg – was also fucking bonkers not to mention deaf and had to be carted off to an insane asylum when Philip was an infant… which might explain a lot.
And as for the Duck’s old man – Prince Andrew of Greece and Denmark of the House of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg? Well, he wasn’t interested in his kids at all (a trait which Philip inherited) and as such quickly fucked off with a young floozy after Slack Alice had been carted off to the loony bin.
Course, like the majority of the British and European Royal families, the Duck’s old man was bisexual and quite possibly a paedophile.
Queen Elizabeth II‘s husband, Prince Philip the Duke of Edinburgh, had a mother who was born profoundly deaf and a father who was actively, aggressively bisexual. His father, Prince Andrew of Greece, was a disgraced military commander, charged with treason for failure to carry out orders in the Greco-Turkish War (1919-1921) and who was subsequently stripped of his royal titles. Blamed for the loss of Greek territory in that disastrous war, he was imprisoned and sentenced to death. His wife, Princess Alice of Battenberg, arranged for intervention by British King George V, who negotiated for Andrew’s release and rescue.
Andrew lived a lascivious lifestyle, carrying on one affair after another with both men and women, so it is not surprising that he largely ignored his wife and children... source
It is also worth pointing out at this juncture that Slack Alice was the sister of the dangerous, predatory, bisexual, boy raping nonce, Lord Louie Mountbatten who is still hailed to this day as a “British Hero” – he wasn’t; he was a German, child-raping, sick-fuck.
Nevertheless, he too changed his family name in 1917 from ‘Battenburg‘ to the anglo-saxon sounding ‘Mountbatten‘ in order to hide his German roots.
Now I mention the sick-fuck Mountbatten because he is uncle to Philip (MOUNTBATTEN) and extremely important to his nephews story – to such an extent in fact that he will be popping up throughout this sordid tale.
And as a footnote to this segment it is also worth mentioning that whilst Bizzy Lizzie’s 8 day period of mourning is dwarfed by Queen Sticky Vicky’s 40 years, that didn’t stop the hated monarch shagging about after Albert’s death… Indeed, there are at least two acknowledged affairs that she had with her servants – one a Scotsman and one an Indian.
They do like an Indian do the Royals.
In fact, Uncle Louie Mountbatten and his fag-hag wife had a threesome with the Indian Prime Mincer – which was even admitted by the Daily Chimp, albeit long after the pervert was dead:
And just so as there can be no doubt that Mountbatten was a little-boy raping nonce, the truth emerged in 2019 with the release of an FBI file on the sick-fuck.
Although, it was common knowledge long before that:
And do think on; the Establishment and British Royal Family – to this very day – still regarded the filthy cunt as a National Hero… Which does indeed speak volumes about the perverted scum.
Nevertheless, to get back on track by returning to the retardedness that runs rampant throughout the inbred Royal Dynasties and I should point out that the more modern day Royal family tend to do what all Monsters do with their mad relations – namely lock them away and pretend that they don’t exist rather than have them quietly murdered as they did back in the day.
Take the mentally retarded Prince Eddy for instance:
Prince Albert Victor, the Duke of Clarence otherwise known by his colloquial name of ‘Prince Eddy was the eldest son of Albert Edward the Prince of Wales (later King Edward VII) and Princess Alexandra (later Queen Alexandra), the grandson of the reigning monarch, Queen Victoria and older brother of the future king of England, King George V and as such would have been first in line to the throne.
Unfortunately, due to centuries of Royal inbreeding, Eddy was partially deaf and of well below average intelligence and was thus shunned by the majority of his cold-hearted family.
Queen Victoria, the reigning monarch at the time was a great supporter and patron of Freemasonry as were all the Royal males of the age (and as they still are today). Indeed it was the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family (the current British royals) who had sponsored the rise of Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Illuminati, originally a Freemasonry offshoot, in Bavaria in the 18th century. Weishaupt was indeed born and raised in the Bavarian town of Gotha.
There are several Masonic lodges in the Royal palaces of Britain, the most significant one perhaps being the Royal Alpha Lodge in Kensington Palace. In 1885 Prince Eddy was initiated into the Royal Alpha Lodge at the behest of his father.
As well as his membership of the lodge, Eddy was also a regular ‘customer’ at a homosexual-paedophile brothel in Cleveland Street, London and indiscreetly instigated a series of explicit love-letters with a young boy employed at these most vile of premises.
In the meantime, Prince Eddy, his mental health by now completely shattered, was given into the care of the Earl of Strathmore who owned Glamis Castle in Scotland. The royal family then blatantly lied to the world and announced that Eddy had sadly passed away at the age of only 28, on the 14th January 1892 due to influenza, but of course Eddy was still alive and being held in Balmoral Castle having not yet made the final move to Glamis.
Balmoral is approximately 1000 feet (300 metres) above sea-level and as such is partly surrounded by steep cliffs. This was the intended site for the planned murder of Eddy to be undertaken by Randolph Churchill (Winston’s old man – Spivey) and John Netley the coachman. The prince was pushed from the cliff-top but somehow managed to survive his fall and after the passage of two days had endeavoured to crawl all the way back to Balmoral where he was found at the door by his disbelieving hosts.
It was decided after this that the best option would be to just incarcerate him at Glamis for the rest of his life and the Earl of Strathmore agreed to undertake this task on behalf of the royals in return for one simple favour. The favour he stipulated was that one of his daughters be allowed to marry a future king of England.
Poor Eddy died in 1933, forty one years after his ‘official’ death date and during this time, his mother visited him only once, but took a photograph of him which she apparently sent to her cousin. This photograph is still in existence and shows a much older Eddy thoughtfully painting a picture which would sadly never be seen by anyone outside the walls of Glamis Castle.
The pact between Strathmore and the royal family was eventually fulfilled in 1923 when Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon (his daughter, b. 1900) married the future King George VI of England after originally being betrothed to his brother, the former King Edward VIII (he of abdication fame).
In 1936 George ascended the throne upon his elder brother’s abdication and Elizabeth became his queen consort. Elizabeth of course was more commonly known as the Queen Mother and the mother of the current incumbent of the family firm, Queen Elizabeth the second. She went to her grave in 2002 without ever revealing the secret and thus the world was never aware of this unholy pact… Source: John Hamer (author & historian)
Now without wishing to go too far of track, the fact that John Hamer mentions Freemasons in the above needs to be discussed further being as the press have now revealed that Philip was also a member of the secret society – which they obviously portrayed as being a good thing:
However, the truth of the matter is that Philip’s involvement with the Masons is the direct opposite of being a good thing… And neither is it breaking news since I first wrote about the Duck’s ties to the organisation back in 2012.
Nevertheless, most people perceive Freemasons as being middle aged, upper middle class businessmen who stand on one leg while given each other funny handshakes yet nothing could be further from the truth.
You see, in reality the Freemasonry secret society is a global cult that requires its members to swear an oath of allegiance to the Masonic god, Jahbuhlun, AKA Baal, AKA Satan.
Moreover, the top brass in British Government, Police Force, Judiciary, Secret Services and the Armed Forces are all 33 degree Freemasons – as are all members of the Royal Family.
However it is actually the Duke of Kent who is the Firms most senior Mason; not Prick Philip.
Indeed, one of the most powerful factions of freemasonry is ‘The Knights of Malta’ who wear the Maltese cross around their necks, just like the one Prince Charles wore around his neck when he married the teenage Lady Diana Spencer.
The Maltese cross can also be found on the British Coronation Crown… And on the uniform of the Nazi’s – see how it all fits?
And of course it is well documented that Hitler and his top brass were all involved in the black arts.
Furthermore, a symbol on Prince Charles’ Coat of Arms is that of The Order of the Garter. The Order of the Garter is the parent organization over Freemasonry worldwide. When a man becomes a 33rd Degree Mason, he swears allegiance to that organization and thereby to Prince Charles.
Moreover, according to “The ‘Morals and Dogma’ of the Ancient and Accepted Rite of Freemasonry” written by Albert Pike (Grand Commander, Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, July 14, 1889) Lucifer is the GOD of Freemasonry (see page 321 of the 1942 edition).
And on page 819 of that book you will also find an example as to why there are so many people in Freemasonry who believe themselves to be good Christians… They have purposely been misled:
“Masonry intentionally misleads the low degree initiates and hides the truth that the god of Freemasonry is Lucifer, except to those in the 30th and higher degrees. “The Blue Degrees are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are on display there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them”.
Further proof of Freemasonry being a Satanic organisation can be seen in how they measure the year. For instance the year 1998 (up until September) is according to freemasonry the year 5997 AL which is 5997 Anno Lucifer.
Now, the 13 Illuminati bloodline families (the Windsors, the Rockefellers, the Rothschild, etc) all stem from a race known as the Merovingians who worshiped – and still do to this day – the goddess Semiramis.
Semiramis was the wife of Nimrod and Queen of Babylon and some Merovingian Kings were members of the Knights Templar (Freemasons) who practiced Kabbalistic ritual.
The higher initiates of Freemasonry are heavily into reverse symbolism, or put another way; taking something good and re-presenting it so as ordinary people associate it with something evil and vice-versa. Two good examples are the Swastika and the Statue of Liberty. The Swastika is a peace symbol but it is associated with Hitler & the Third Reich, thus it is viewed as being a sign of evil.
Likewise – but in reverse – most people believe that the Statue of Liberty in New York is a symbol of liberty and freedom. This simply isn’t true. The Statue of Liberty is in fact a depiction of the Goddess Semiramis who is also known as The Goddess Diana.
And indeed there is a mirror image of the Statue of Liberty on an island, in the river Seine in Paris that runs alongside the dual carriageway that leads into the Pont de l’Alma tunnel where Princess Diana was supposedly killed. In her hand the statue holds the ‘eternal flame’ which is a classic symbol of the Babylonian Brotherhood (the illuminati).
The Eternal flame is also held in the hand of the statue of Prometheus outside of the Rockefeller Center in New York and is used by the Brotherhood as a signature of their assassinations. For instance, a flame was placed on President John Kennedy’s grave at Arlington cemetery and the Freemasons erected an obelisk and flame in Dealey Place, close to the spot where he was murdered.
So with that in mind, is it just a coincidence that there is also a replica of the Statue of Liberty flame placed on a black pentagram situated above the Pont de L’Alma tunnel in Paris where Diana allegedly died – as well as there being an urn and flame placed on the island where she is ‘buried’?
Now, after Semiramis, AKA the Goddess Diana died, the Merovingians dug underground chambers just outside of Paris where they conducted their rituals/sacrifices to her. As Paris expanded with time these underground temples were incorporated into the city and many still survive today.
The Pont de l’Alma tunnel was built on the site of one of these underground temples. The Goddess Diana was a Moon Goddess and Pont de l’Alma translates as ‘passage or bridge of the moon goddess’.
Furthermore, amongst the many myths that surround the Goddess Diana you find a recurring theme of Lakes, Islands and Tree-Groves as places of worship.
And that is why an ultra exclusive, ultra secretive, glorified scout camp for former US Presidents and powerful businessmen known as Bohemian Grove is held in a tree grove. There, members dress up in hooded cloaks and make mock human sacrifice to a 40ft high Owl statue situated… Wait for it, wait for it… On an Island in the middle of a lake.
This 40 ft high statue of an Owl that ex US Presidents such as Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George Bush make mock sacrifice to, is a representation of Moloch, the God of child sacrifice (I hope you are beginning to catch on by now?).
And like the many other gods and demons to be found in the Bible, Moloch appears as a Prince of Hell.
Indeed, one researcher into Freemasonry, The Reverend John Lawrence wrote a book entitled Freemasonry: Is it a religion and his findings concluded that freemasonry is indeed a cult that worships a God which certainly isn’t the God of the Holy Bible.
It is also safe to say that all of the Monster-Elites – without exception – belong to multiple secret organisation such as the Freemasons, Skull and Bones, Ordo Templis Orientis, Rosicrucians and so on, and so on… And tellingly, all of these Secret Societies indulge in Devil worship and child sacrifice.
Course, Freemasons at grass roots level – who are totally unaware that they are part of a Satanic cult – often do a lot of good work for charity, but that does not apply to the likes of the Royal Parasites and other members of the monster-elite who have been practicing the dark arts for centuries… And even more crucially; they still do today.
Nevertheless I need to get back on track or I will be writing this article forever and as such I shall now discuss the retarded son of the-name-changing, King George V… Of whom the Independent newspaper had this to say:
All families have secrets, and the Windsors are no exception. Buried in the archives, for instance, there may be more to discover about Prince John, George V’s youngest son, a mentally retarded epileptic who was removed at an early age to a farm on the Sandringham estate, and died in 1919 at the age of 13... Source
Now what on earth do they mean by: “there may be more to discover“?
Well let me tell you that 90% of the worlds media is reportedly controlled by just six extremely powerful families/corporations and as such the MSM will NEVER print the truth… To do so would be detrimental to those 6 families and the other 1% of sick-monsters who rule the world.
However, most journalists worth their salt know what’s what and very often print veiled clues in their reports as to what really went down – more often than not with the blessing of their masters, who just love to flaunt their sick-fuck values knowing full well that we cannot do a single fucking thing about it.
Course, 99% of those clues go right over the top of the head of the brainwashed, worn-down, wholly apathetic general public who by and large struggle to even finish reading an article, let alone read between the lines… But trust me because the truth is there and in this instance, the Independent newspaper is telling us that Prince John was in all probability murdered.
In fact, as little as three or four years ago I could have come up with any number of articles proving the fact (and indeed I did so on my old – now defunct – website), but since then the internet has been hugely sanitized and censored and such information is now almost impossible to find via a search engine.
Nevertheless, there can be no denying that the Queens Uncle, Edward VIII’s reaction to his little brothers death was strange to say the least, even by Royal standards – describing it as “little more than a regrettable nuisance“.
Furthermore, death from epilepsy (Prince John’s official cause of death) is very rare and quite tellingly there are no official portraits or photographs of him after the age of eight!
Nevertheless, at the very best Prince John (the Queens Uncle) was a huge embarrassment to the family and – absent of any proof to the contrary – we have to accept that he was sent into hiding where he very, very rarely saw his parents & siblings; if ever… Which of course he wouldn’t have done if he had indeed been murdered at the age of eight.
And that is exactly what also happened to Sweaty Betty’s 1st cousins, Nerissa and Katherine Bowes-Lyon who were both nieces of the Queer Mother. The following was written in 2012 by the now deceased historian, T Stokes:
The Queen’s cousin Nerissa was 22 and the Queen’s look-alike cousin Katherine was 15 when they were sent to the grim Royal Earlswood Mental Hospital. Both were severely handicapped and virtually unable to speak. They were said to have a mental age of six.
Cousin Nerissa is now deceased but cousin Katherine, aged 86, is still alive as of 2012, although severely mentally retarded. She is neglected and never visited.
Burke’s Peerage which records the “who’s who” lineage of the British aristocracy, recorded false information that the first cousins of Queen Elizabeth II died in 1940 and 1961.
Despite the Queen’s fabulous wealth, she spent not one penny on cousin Nerissa’s burial. Nerissa was buried like a pauper in an unceremonious grave marked by a 6-inch-high plastic tag bearing a serial number and the name ”Bowes-Lyon”.
Cousin Katherine who spent decades in the Royal Earlswood Asylum, was moved to Ketwin House for the mentally disabled. Following allegations that male staff members were washing female patients, Ketwin House was forced to shut down. Witnesses found bruises on Katherine’s hand and hip.
Despite the Queen’s fabulous wealth, she spent not one penny to keep her cousin Katherine at Ketwin House. The cost ? About 770 pounds per patient per year. According to a former staff member, Katherine is alert, understands what she’s being told and communicates by pointing and smiling. Not one member of the Royal family has visited her in 60 years.
It turns out that the Queen’s mother also had cousins who were locked away in the same mental institution on the same day in 1941 as Nerissa and Katherine.
An ‘out of sight, out of mind’ approach to family members with “embarrassing” problems like mental illness and epilepsy is nothing new in the royal household.
In 1905, George V (Of name change fame) and Queen Mary had a son, Prince John. Until the age of four, Prince John was just as much in the spotlight then as Prince William was in 1986 at the age of four.
When Prince John suffered his first epileptic fit, his royal parents excluded him from official family photographs. He wasn’t even allowed to attend his own father’s coronation as King of England in 1911. In 1917, the King hid his epileptic son by sending him to die in an isolated farmhouse. John never saw his parents again. He died two years later – reportedly in his sleep.
Another propaganda Oscar winner, The King’s Speech, focused on the Queen’s father and his speech impediment. There was no mention in the movie that the cause may have been from generations of royal inbreeding.
Monarchy blockbusters are designed to sell the image of the filthy rich royals as sensitive, caring, human and deserving of adoration and taxpayer support. No one would dare make a Hollywood movie about the King’s nazi brother, Edward VIII who abdicated.
PHOTO: (left)the metal defective Katherine Bowes-Lyon – (Right) for future reference notice the way that the Queen Mother is clutching her daughters breast… She too has been publicly accused of being a paedophile
And of course it is also worth noting that Edward VIII (mentioned in the above) was not only a bisexual, cross-dressing pervert but he too had a long on-off love affair with his cousin, Noncey Mountbatten:
King Edward VIII, also known as David, was a close friend to Lord Mountbatten. He was known for socialising, partying and being a keen bachelor up until he met divorcee Wallis Simpson — and renounced the throne in order to wed her.
Lord Louis was a great grandson of Queen Victoria and the uncle of Prince Philip (consort of Queen Elizabeth II). Mountbatten was also a promiscuous bisexual who was famously rumored to have had an affair with Edward VIII (who was Prince of Wales at the time). Source
PHOTO: Ed & Lou
That is to say that the pair had a long on-off love affair until Edward abdicated – after which he was no longer any use to Mountbatten; who was determined to be the power behind the throne at all costs.
Edward of course abdicated because of his love & desire to marry the old slapper Wallis Simpson… Who was rumoured to be a hermaphrodite:
The British royal family has weathered many storms of controversy, none greater than the obsessive romance between Edward VIII, heir to the throne, and twice-divorced American socialite Wallis Simpson which ultimately resulted in the abdication and forced exile of the charismatic King.
To add more drama to the already incredible fairy-tale gone wrong, Baltimore-born Wallis was alleged to have been born intersex – that is, born with male sex organs and genetic characteristics... Source
However, given the high number of different cocks that she had over the years I find that rumour a bit hard to believe and as such, in all probability she just had a huge fucking clit.
And of course, Edward (born to German parents) was also very good friends with Adolph Hitler and a huge fan of the Third Reich & German war machine.
PHOTOS: Edward & the Nazis
As were three out of the four sisters of Phil the Duck who all married top-wanking Nazi Officers – one of whom christened their son Adolf, after Hitler.
Meantime the other sister married a German Aristocrat.
In fact when Philip’s sister, Cecile was killed in a plane crash in 1937 she was given a proper Nazi send off attended by the then 16 yr old Duck and of course his German Uncle, Noncey Mountbatten:
And remember, the Nazi persecution of the Jews, Gypsies, Mentally-Handicapped & Gaylords was in full swing at that time.
In fact after being in exile in France as a young boy, the young teenage Philip was later sent to live in Nazi Germany where he obviously attended school and by his own admission said that “plenty of heel clicking, Sieg Heiling and Nazi saluting were the order of the day“… Which is in all probability where his racist tendency’s were first formed.
Although as far as the press is concerned, since his death all of those racist, inappropriate remarks that he made in the past were just the jokes of a delightful, friendly fella who was just trying to put people at ease… Here is but just one of the many farticles making light of his remarks:
Well I certainly did not love him for it. In fact he made me cringe. After all, he blurted out all of those many, many gaffes on occasions that required diplomacy & respect.
Therefore, if he could not keep his thoughts to himself at such times, it then becomes blatantly obvious just how indoctrinated into his rancid brain his racist thoughts actually were.
Indeed, I personally found the man an international embarrassment and by way of a reminder here are just 25 of the hundreds of inappropriate, off-the-cuff comments he made when he clearly should have known better:
1. “British women can’t cook,” he told the Scottish Womens’ Institute in 1961. Lovely.
2. “It looks like the kind of thing my daughter would bring back from her school art lessons,” he muttered while being shown Ethiopian art in 1965.
3. “I would like to go to Russia very much, although the bastards murdered half my family,” at a very heated period of history in 1967… Told ya – Philip had much more Russian blood running through his veins than he did English.
4. “What do you gargle with? Pebbles?” he told singer Tom Jones at the 1969 Royal Variety Performance. Later he added: “It’s difficult to see how it’s possible to become immensely valuable by singing what are the most hideous songs.”
5. “We don’t come here for our health. We can think of other ways of enjoying ourselves,” he told journalists in Canada in 1976... For instance visiting a Canadian children’s home and taking 10 of them away – never to be seen again (Google it).
6. “You are a woman, aren’t you?” he said to a Kenyan woman, who was presenting him with a small gift in 1984.
7. “If you stay here much longer you will all be slitty-eyed,” the Prince told British exchange students who lived in Xian in 1986. When asked on his opinion of Beijing, he replied: “Ghastly.”
8. “If it has four legs and it is not a chair, if it has two wings and flies but is not an aeroplane, and if it swims and it is not a submarine, the Cantonese will eat it.” Again with the Chinese insults, when he addressed a World Wildlife Fund meeting in 1986.
PHOTO: Prick Philip & the Queer with the tiger he shot in 1961… The same year he became president of the World Wildlife Fund UK… Cunt!
9. “I don’t think a prostitute is more moral than a wife, but they are doing the same thing,” when dismissing claims those who slaughter for meat have greater moral authority than those who partake in blood sports in 1988.
10. “Oh no, I might catch some ghastly disease,” when asked if he wanted to pet a koala in Australia back in 1992.
11. “You can’t have been here that long — you haven’t got a pot belly,” he told a British tourist during a visit to Budapest in 1993.
12. “Aren’t most of you descended from pirates?,” he enquired to an islander while in the Cayman Islands in 1994.
13. “How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to pass the test?” he asked a Scottish driving instructor in 1995.
14. “It was part of the fortunes of war. We didn’t have counsellors rushing around every time somebody let off a gun, asking ‘Are you all right — are you sure you don’t have a ghastly problem?’ You just got on with it!” when asked about stress counselling for soldiers in 1995.
15. “You managed not to get eaten then?” the Prince asked a British student who had been trekking in Papua New Guinea, in 1998.
16. “Where’s the Southern Comfort?” he said on receipt of a basket of Southern goods from the U.S. ambassador in London, in 1999.
17. “Deaf? If you’re near there, no wonder you are deaf,” he told a group of deaf school children, who were nearby a Caribbean steel drum band in 2000.
18. “You could do with losing a little bit of weight,” he told 13-year-old Andrew Adams, after hearing he wanted to become an astronaut while visiting a science museum in 2001.
19. “Do you still throw spears at each other?” he asked a group of Indigenous Australians in 2002, while on a visit to Australia with the Queen.
20. “So who’s on drugs here?… He looks as if he’s on drugs,” he said of a 14-year-old boy while at a Bangladeshi youth club in 2002.
21. “You look like you’re ready for bed!” he told the President of Nigeria in 2003, who was dressed in traditional robes.
22. “Is it a strip club?” he asked when meeting a female Sea Cadet who told the Prince she worked in a nightclub, in 2009.
23. “That’s a nice tie … Do you have any knickers in that material?” he asked Annabel Goldie, the Scottish Conservative leader, when welcoming Benedict XVI to Edinburgh in 2010.
24. “The Philippines must be half-empty — you’re all here running the NHS,” he told nurses at Luton and Dunstable Hospital in 2013.
25. “Just take the f**king picture!” he told a photographer, during a Battle of Britain event in 2015.
Course, the press print so much hypocritical shit that they are easy to catch out with their bullshit.
For instance, in 2019 the mega-cunt and major-hypocrite, Piers Morgan quite savagely – albeit wholly accurately – said the following about Prick Philippos:
“Prince Philip is the rudest human being I have ever met but it gave me a rare personal insight into what a disagreeable character the grand old Duke can be when he chooses.”… Source
And after the Duck supposedly had his infamous car crash the same year, Morgan added the following to his previous comments:
It’s time the Queen gave her rude, stubborn, insensitive, arrogant and dangerous Duke of Hazard his driving machine orders.
Yet since Philip’s death last week, Morgan has now shown himself up to be the crawl-arse, sycophantic, pathetic waste of space he really is:
PHOTO: Then & Now
And of course, while Morgan is undoubtedly a putrid self-serving piece of shit, he is in all fairness no different to all the rest of the useful idiots employed by the MSM who’s roles are to act as gatekeepers to the abhorrently sick world of the Satanic, child-raping elites… Although I should point out that it is only because of their fantastic wealth that I call them ‘elites’.
But I am getting off track again, so back to pre-WW2 where the Queen was being indoctrinated in the ways of the Fatherland by her Mother and her perverted Uncle:
Mind you, the deranged Queer Mother was every bit as racist as her future son-in-law:
The Queen Mother refers to anyone black as a “nig-nog” or a “blackamoor”. She backed white minority rule in Rhodesia and passionately supports the death penalty.
She distrusted Lord Mountbatten, viceroy of India, “for giving away the empire” and disliked his wife because “her mother was half-Jewish”. She refers to Germans as “Huns” and raises her glass every time the name Margaret Thatcher is mentioned. She is opposed to immigration and thinks that black Africans cannot run their own countries... Source
Hmmm, no wonder then that she allegedly hated Philip The Hun.
Nevertheless, it is no coincidence that the Queer Mother is seen in the photo above with her brother-in-law, Edward VII.
You see, the press would have you believe that she fucking hated Cock-Steady-Eddie because his abdication meant that her half-witted husband was forced to become King… A job he was apparently unprepared for, although fuck knows how hard it can be – even for someone as backwards as her “beloved” Bertie! Especially so giving mind to the caliber of Barking-Bertie’s ancestors.
And once again, for evidence that the Queens old man was not the full fucking ticket, we now have to rely on past MSM articles since other – more forthcoming – reports have now been erased from the internets search engines.
Mind you, having said that the following report taken from the Chimp in 2009 is pretty damning evidence:
Prince Albert, as the King was born – ‘Bertie’ to his family and friends – was a late developer in matters of love.
A shy, sensitive child, plagued by illness, his legs were put in splints at the age of eight to avoid knock-knees, and he developed serious gastric problems, a direct consequence of being badly fed in infancy by an overworked and resentful nurse.
Ha, ha, ha, “badly fed in infancy by an overworked and resentful nurse” my arse although the Royal Family do tend to employ tyrannical Nannies devoid of any warmth so as their children grow up cold, uncaring and totally incapable of forming any emotional attachments.
However, in truth the real reason for Bertie’s many health problems was without doubt because of the family’s inbreeding… After all, you also need to remember that his younger brother John was murde… sorry, I mean exiled for being severely mentally handicapped.
Worst of all, he was afflicted with a chronic stammer, possibly the result of his father’s instructions to his tutor that he should be broken of his left-handedness.
And once again, we are presented with evidence of how cold & cruel these parasites are towards their children.
All his life he would be subject to sudden outbursts of temper, fits of introspective gloom and deep melancholy.
As is the norm for many of the mentally handicapped.
The photographer Sir Cecil Beaton would later record that the future George VI ‘was a backward young man and the courtiers were beginning to worry... Source
Bingo! After all, is not describing someone as being “backward” a polite way of calling them ‘retarded’?
Nevertheless, nothing could be further from the truth in the claim that the Queer Mother hated Edward because of the role thrust upon her husband by the perverts abdication – and that is to ignore the fact that by abdicating Liz & Bertie were now afforded a life of luxury far beyond anyone’s wildest dreams.
You see, if you have been paying attention to this brilliantly-written, extremely-enjoyable and wholly-factual article you will remember the snippet I posted higher up written by the very-well-respected historian John Hamer, in regard to the feeble-minded Prince Albert – the Duke of Clarence, otherwise known by his colloquial name of ‘Prince Eddy whom Winston Churchill’s old man had tried to murder on behalf of the Royal Family.
However following that botched attempt, “It was decided that the best option would be to just incarcerate him at Glamis for the rest of his life and the Earl of Strathmore (the Queen Mothers old man) agreed to undertake this task on behalf of the royals in return for one simple favour. The favour he stipulated was that one of his daughters be allowed to marry a future king of England”.
And of course, after learning of this arranged marriage young Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon (the Queer Mother) was absolutely-fucking-delighted being as she was hopelessly in love with the future King Edward – a fact Edward divulged himself to the Daily Mail Journalist, Michael Thornton in 1971.
However unluckily for Bizzy Lizzy the 1st, Edward wasn’t fucking interested in her – which he wouldn’t be given his homosexual tendencies and penchant for women with clits the size of dicks.
Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon married Prince Albert who was second in line to the throne. Elizabeth was also keen on Albert’s brother, the man directly in line to throne, who would later become Edward VIII.
But he was not interested, so she eventually settled for his brother. One biographer, Michael Thornton, writes, “Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was determined to marry into the royal family, so after his third proposal, she settled for the runt of the litter... Source
Thornton went on to say in another article that he wrote after the Queer mother had died, that Edward had referred to his Sister in Law as a “Spiteful old soak” – a soak being a term for a hopeless alcoholic, which indeed she was.
And then there is this:
Meanwhile, Elizabeth, aside from obviously being impressed with his position and future prospects, by many accounts fell genuinely in love with Edward, called David by friends and family.
In his later interviews with Michael Thornton for his book “Royal Feud”,he states his conviction that Elizabeth “was overly fond” of him. David Duff quotes her directly as stating her future brother-in-law “was such fun…..then.”
The former statement reveals a man being pursued by a woman whose ardor he doesn’t share, while the latter indicates a woman smitten, until she discovers an unpleasant truth.
The truth of the matter was David, who knew that his brother was also in love with her, quickly made up his mind about Elizabeth and decided she wasn’t for him... Source
Mind you, Edward was not lying when he called Bowes-Lyon “spiteful“, because after he snubbed her in favour of Walis Simpson (who was also alleged to have been a former prostitute), Lizzie actively set about “scheming with his own courtiers to undermine his position as king and prevent him from marrying the woman he loved“… Source
Now you have to ask yourself why Bowes-Lyon would have tried (and succeeded) in undermining Edwards position as King if she did not herself want to be Queen – which she would obviously become once he abdicated.
Moreover, are those not the actions of a spiteful woman scorned? Certainly some believe that to be true:
Of course, Elizabeth would never forget her unrequited love for her brother-in-law, and when the time finally came to sink a knife in his back for rejecting her, she happily obliged. While several factors played into his decision to abdicate in 1936, Elizabeth undoubtedly helped grease the wheels... Source
Course, it is also worth pointing out that there could be another reason that the Queer Mother did not marry Edward. I mean, the deal struck by her father and the Royal family involved his daughter marrying a king – which Edward obviously was.
However, many Royal historians believe that Edward was incapable of having children – meaning the throne would be left without a heir – and as such his love for Wallis Simpson was just a convenient excuse to get rid of him:
Throughout all their years together, the great love story of Wallis Simpson and King Edward VIII had one glaring problem: They never had children, and not necessarily for lack of trying. The reason behind this was tragic. Many historians believe that a spell of mumps in Edward’s youth rendered the Duke of Windsor royally infertile... Source
Now to my mind, that theory is very plausible although I do believe that the Royals always have more than just one reason for how they have acted over the centuries.
I mean given the fact that Edward was at best bisexual I find it very hard to believe that he was so in love with this very plain looking married bird – who had an extremely dubious past – that he was prepared to give up the throne for her.
After all, he could have retained the crown and still kept Wallis as his mistress in the very same way that Prick Charles kept Camilla Parker Horse-face as his bit on the side throughout his marriage to Diana.
In fact I do not think that you will find a single king who has not had at least one mistress and there was certainly no pressure on Edward to get married being as that is not part of the deal.
Moreover, if he was a jaffa he could just have employed a surrogate to do the do as is the norm with the monster-elite.
Certainly, he was in no rush to marry the old slapper and didn’t do so until a year after his abdication.
And neither was Mrs Simpson that strongly committed to her perverted husband because she had a string of extra marital affairs including one with the high wanking Nazi, Joachim von Ribbentrop:
The government was also aware that Wallis Simpson was in fact involved in other sexual relationships. This included a married car mechanic and salesman called Guy Trundle and Edward Fitzgerald, Duke of Leinster.
More importantly, they had evidence that Wallis Simpson was having a relationship with Joachim von Ribbentrop, the German Ambassador to Britain.
The FBI definitely believed this was the case and one report suggested that he had sent a bouquet of seventeen red roses to Princess Stephanie’s flat in Bryanston Court because each bloom represented an occasion they had slept together… Source
Therefore it can be taken as read that Wallis would have been just as happy to be his mistress than have him abdicate and lose all the very many privileges and luxuries that go with shagging a king.
Course, there is no denying the fact that Edward and Mrs Simpson never having children was mighty strange although it was also reported that she too could not have children, following a fucked up abortion:
While in Shanghai in 1925 Wallis Spencer had an affair with the handsome fascist, Count Galeazzo Ciano, who was later to become the son-in-law of Benito Mussolini. The affair resulted in a pregnancy, and a carelessly carried out abortion had left Wallis unable to have any more children. Wallis eventually divorced her husband in 1927... Source
Nevertheless, whether or not that true is a matter of debate and I suppose that in reality it could just have been a case of the pair not being able to have children because her huge fucking clit kept getting in the way, thus preventing deep enough penetration.
Therefore, if the reality of the situation was that the real power behind the throne did not want Edward to retain the crown, I would venture that it was because he was too headstrong and unmalleable, unlike his feeble-minded brother.
And of course, with Liz the 1st marrying Albert the simpleton the morally bankrupt deal struck by her father years earlier (for his daughter to marry a king) was now well and truly honoured.
Now whilst I am at it, I will also remind you that the Queen Mother has been publicly accused of being a paedophile:
“We were involved in and spoke at the UK Rally Against Child Abuse in Trafalgar Square last Saturday (7 Aug 2010). Filmmaker and child abuse survivor Bill Maloney opened the Rally with a rousing speech in which he committed treason under Nelson’s column declaring that the Queen Mother was a paedophile. Diana had apparently declared to a close friend that she was evil. Her footman, who had previously been a butler to the Queen, was a convicted child sex offender who used to groom his victims by taking them to parties with the Queen Mother at Clarence House” – Spokesperson for UKRACA
Course, that would explain why the old soak surrounded herself with other nonces – Back Stairs Billy (Google him) and Paul Kidd, to name but two:
A paedophile royal butler who took one of his victims to tea with the Queen Mother was jailed today for a minimum of six years.
Described by police as a “brilliant groomer”, Paul Kidd, 55, of Stalybridge, Greater Manchester, had pleaded guilty to a string of sex offences at an earlier hearing... Source
Nevertheless, I am drifting again so getting back to how Philip and his Royal in laws allegiances do not lie with the British people… They are German through and through and committed to Nazi ideology – with the monster-elite’s long term goal being world wide fascism.
In fact, when Germany surrendered, the treacherous double agent Anthony Blunt was dispatched on a secret mission to retrieve extremely sensitive correspondence sent by members of the Royal Family to their German relatives:
At the end of the war Anthony Blunt went on a secret mission for the Royal family. According to Hugh Trevor-Roper, Blunt had been sent to retrieve documents that were believed to be in the hands of the royal family’s many German relations. It was feared that the contents of these letters would be published in American newspapers. Blunt told Trevor-Roper that his mission had been successful and gave him some of the details of what was in the letters. It was clear that Blunt had made himself familiar with the contents of these papers… Source
It is also worth noting that the “war hero” Noncey Mountbatten stands accused of being the traitor who kept the lines of communication going between the Royal family and their Hitler supporting relatives:
Prince Philip’s uncle and sponsor, Lord Louis Mountbatten (originally, Battenberg of the House of Hesse) was a central figure in the 1930s Nazi-British channel. Until he was forced to abdicate, King Edward VIII enjoyed the full backing of Dickie Mountbatten. Through much of World War II, secret channels of communication were maintained between the British royal family and their pro-Hitler cousins in Germany, by Lord Mountbatten, through his sister Louise, who was crown princess of pro-Nazi Sweden. Louise was Prince Philip’s aunt.
And remember, Kraut Mountbatten was a high ranking flotilla commander in the British Navy at the time and as such, should have been hung as a traitor.
But I digress so let’s get back to Anthony Blunt
Now, what can I say about Blunt the Cunt?
Well, for starters he was a Cousin to the Queer Mother although some historians have him down as her illegitimate brother-in-law:
Anthony Blunt (1907-1983) was born the third cousin of Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon who became the wife of King George VI and is best known as the late Queen Mother – the woman that Princess Diana described as evil. This was a good description given that the lady they called ‘The Nation’s Grandmother’ was one of highest satanic witches in Europe.
Blunt’s mother was the second cousin of the black witch’s father Claude Bowes-Lyon, the 14th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne. Blunt and his brothers would go for afternoon tea with the Bowes-Lyons at their London home in Mayfair and he was in the royal, political and Intelligence loop almost from the start.
There is another highly significant aspect of the Blunt story according to the London Daily Mail. The paper reported that he told colleagues that he was actually the secret son of King George V, the brother of Bowes-Lyon’s spouse, George VI... Source
And there is no denying that Blunt certainly had the look of George V’s other children:
And it gets worse from this point on… You see, Blunt was also an extremely dangerous, homosexual paedophile – no surprise there then and obviously no problem to the nonce infested Windsors:
The Windsors would have also known that Blunt was a paedophile and it is no surprise to me whatsoever after hearing him named many times that he has turned up on the alleged lists of visitors to the Elm Guest House. The stories have long circulated about his procurement of young boys, mostly from ‘care’ homes, and his paedophile parties.
These include how Blunt would murder children through asphyxiation while they were being raped because of the apparent sexual ‘high’ these sickest of people get from this... Source: As above
Now, after the 2nd world war Blunt worked as a Spy for MI5. However, sometime in the early 1950’s his employers suspected that he was also a member of the infamous Cambridge Spy Ring who were selling our most sensitive secrets to the Russians.
The Cambridge spy ring was made up of Anthony Blunt, Donald Maclean, Guy Burgess, Kim Phillby and Victor Rothschild.
However, unlike his fellow traitors, Donald Maclean and Guy Burgess, who had to flee to the Soviet Union in 1951 to avoid prosecution – and who were later joined by Kim Phillby in 1963 – Blunt was given immunity from prosecution due to a matter of national security i.e his close connection to the Royal Family and the danger he posed to the parasites should he have been put on trial:
This job of mine really is too easy once you know what you are looking for… The article starts thus:
Anthony Blunt gave his Russian spymasters a collection of Royal letters so compromising, it could have been used to blackmail the Windsors, according to a leading figure in the KGB.
Written by the Queen’s uncles, the Dukes of Windsor and Kent, to their German relatives, the correspondence is likely to show the depth of their Nazi sympathies and would have proved hugely embarrassing had it been released in the Cold War years.
He had always insisted the information he passed to the Russians was ‘almost exclusively about German intelligence services’.
But a Channel 4 documentary has now confirmed that Blunt also made copies of Royal correspondence and passed it directly to the KGB.
It is likely that the Kremlin still holds copies of the letters today.
The betrayal was revealed by Russian spymaster Yuri Modin, formerly controller for the Cambridge spy ring, which included Blunt... Source
Course, even more damning is the fact that the Duck & the Queer would have known full well that Blunt was selling our top secret information to the Russians… After all, as our reigning monarch Sweaty Betty is briefed on a weekly basis by the heads of MI5 & MI6 and it beggars belief that they would so much as dare to try and withhold such information from her.
And then there is this:
The Royals knew about Blunt’s treasonous background. Army officer Philip Hay went for an interview at Buckingham Palace in 1948 for the post of Private Secretary to the Dowager Duchess of Kent and he said that after they passed Blunt in a corridor, Sir Alan Lascelles, King George VI’s – and later the Queen’s – private secretary, said: ‘That’s our Russian spy’.
Yet Blunt’s career as a Russian Spy was not made public until 1979 when the then Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher was forced to declare the fact to the House Of Commons after overwhelming evidence of Blunts betrayal was leaked into the public domain.
Course, since Blunt didn’t die until 4 years after his exposure you have to ask why the fuck he wasn’t prosecuted at the time since the Germans & Israelis are still pursuing & prosecuting Nazi war criminals to this day, no matter how old they are.
I mean, had Maclean, Burgess & Philby not fled to the safety of Moscow then they would most certainly have been hanged and as such, had Blunt’s betrayal of Britain also become public knowledge then the Establishment would have had no other choice than to hang him too.
And of course the same would have applied to the 5th member of the spy ring, Victor Rothschild who was also too well connected to be exposed until after his death.
Certainly, despite his betrayal to the country both the Queen and the Duck still thought very highly of him.
PHOTO: The Queen & Blunt
Which they would since Blunt once again saved the Royal Bacon by being dispatched for a second time in order to retrieve another batch of “extremely sensitive & damaging evidence” which was alleged to compromise senior members of the Royal family.
However, this time the mission was for Blunt to buy up dubious photos & drawings of Prick Philip & his sister-in-law, Slaggy Maggie made by his close friend, the Satanist & society pimp, Dr Stephen Ward – the scapegoat in the Profumo Affair:
The Profumo Affair was one of the biggest British political scandals of the 20th century. John Profumo was the UK’s secretary of state, who had an affair with model and sex worker Christine Keeler. Stephen Ward was an osteopath, artist and soviet ally, who worked with a soviet spy to get Keeler to extract information from Profumo.
Prince Philip was a friend of Ward’s who had painted Prince Philip and Princess Margaret. Ward was eventually charged with “living off immoral earnings” and sold his artworks of the royals to fund his trial. He committed suicide before the end of his trial in 1963. It was believed, although never confirmed that an associate of Philip’s, Anthony Blunt, tried to buy the paintings off Ward to save the reputation of the royals... Source
Course, Philip’s involvement with Stephen Ward undoubtedly goes much deeper than a few bits of pornographic art work. You see, the Duck also supposedly attended kinky sex parties with Ward and is rumoured to have shagged Christine Keeler – the prostitute at the epicenter of the scandal.
Furthermore, Philip’s friendship with Ward is believed to be the reason that the files on the Profumo case are subject to a hundred year gagging order with them not being set to be released for public scrutiny until 2064… Or at least that is what Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber believes.
The following is what he told the Chimp in 2014:
Andrew Lloyd Webber believes the contents of the file are ‘explosive’. Why is he so certain?
‘I can only say my source is totally reliable – it couldn’t be more reliable,’ says the composer peer. ‘Of course, the person in question has not released any details to me, but is at a very high level indeed.’…
Says Lloyd Webber: ‘We could speculate for ever about who and what is in this file, but that is so dangerous. Goodness knows where it could lead.
One name this unhealthy speculation has inevitably – and quite unfairly – thrown up in high places is Prince Philip, who will be 93 in June.
‘That’s precisely what I mean about the dangers of having to speculate when everyone is so fed up with secrecy,’ says Lord Lloyd-Webber.
So could Prince Philip really be mentioned in the secret files? ‘All we know is that Ward and Prince Philip knew each other because he sketched Philip several times,’ says Lord Lloyd-Webber... Source
And obviously Philips involvement would certainly explain the 100 yr gagging order wouldn’t it? Certainly, both the Duck and Ward regularly attended the notorious Thursday Club – as did Anthony Blunt’s partner in crime, the Russian spy, Kim Phillby:
Prince Philip was a member of the exclusive lunch club, the Thursday Club, who were notorious for having wild parties. In the early 60s, there was a photo taken of a man, naked from behind apart from a skimpy lace apron, serving drinks to other club members. It was rumoured to be Philip, and although there was no concrete evidence to suggest it was him, Private Eye magazine referred to Philip for a long time as “The Naked Waiter.” … Source
And since Ward was also suspected of being a Russian Spy it is then safe to assume that he was good friends with Kim Phillby. Ward also treated Anthony Blunt for a bad back and we know that he was great mates with the Duck so we now have evidence of old Phil associating with three Russian spies… Which would not bother the old bastard in the slightest given his Russian bloodline.
Nevertheless, despite turning a blind eye to this espionage and being totally partisan to the Third Reich, the hypocrite Philip along with the rest of the shameless Royal parasites will happily shed [crocodile] tears in public for the millions of British Servicemen & women who gave their lives for our country.
PHOTO: Once you know the truth, their actions are sickening.
So, with all that in mind, let’s now get back to that meeting between the 18 yr old Duck and his 13 yr old Princess.
I mean, the press are now playing down that perverse first introduction by claiming that Phil was assigned by the navy to entertain the 13 yr old Liz and her 9 yr old sister, Margaret – but that is just total bollox because as we know, the press are barred from reporting the true facts of the matter, namely that the adolescent Princess was being groomed.
After all, why on earth would a handsome, charismatic 18 yr old playboy be assigned to look after two children? I mean did the Princesses not have a nanny or did the Navy not have a female Rating available?
Indeed, given the fact that Philip was not even a British citizen at the time, the decision to appoint him as the [unneeded] two children’s babysitter is at best bizarre.
However, this anomaly had absolutely fuck all to do with bad decisions and everything to do with a sinister, highly thought out strategy put into action by Philip’s dangerous, predatory nonce uncle; Lord Louie Mountbatten.
Now remember, when Mountbatten’s sexual deviant of a boyfriend, Edward VIII abdicated, Nonce Louie was thwarted in his conspiracy to become the real power behind the throne.
Nevertheless, the old adage of: “When one door closes another one opens” became Mountbatten’s motto-of-the-day having quickly recognised that young Princess Elizabeth was now 1st in line to the throne… And not too far into the distant future either, what with the borderline mentally retarded King George VI not being in the best of health.
And with that being the case, Noncey Mountbatten actively encouraged his nephew to pursue a relationship with the 13 yr old child – who was no doubt just reaching puberty. After all, girls back then did not reach puberty until they were at least a couple of years older than girls do today.
In fact there was no end to Mountbatten’s quest to control the Royal parasites:
After playing match-maker to the Queen and Prince Philip many decades before, he (Mountbatten) also attempted to set up Charles with his granddaughter, the Hon Amanda Knatchbull... Source
Yet another case of keeping it in the family.
Nevertheless, it is extremely telling that Mountbatten was present for that first introduction between Phil & Liz and as such it is safe to assume that with such a high rank within the Navy and his connection to the Royal Family, he would have been the one who made the decision for his nephew to play babysitter:
Course, both of the last two photos are very telling. I mean if Phil the kiddie-fiddler had really been assigned by the navy to babysit the two Royal children then why the fuck wasn’t he in uniform?
And I do in fact find that bottom photo extremely creepy given what we now know about the Royal penchant for peadophilia. And so, with that in mind I would also hazard a guess that Philip was sexually abused by his Uncle Noncey since he was put in Mountbatten’s care at the age of eight.
Yet even if the Duck wasn’t sexually abused by his Uncle he MUST have known by the time that he married Sweaty Betty all about Mountbatten’s fondness for raping little boys… Which makes it extremely hard to understand why the Duck was so keen to leave his adolescent son, Prince Charles in Mountbatten’s care.
“Mountbatten was a strong influence in the upbringing of his grand-nephew, Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, and later as a mentor—”Honorary Grandfather” and “Honorary Grandson”, they fondly called each other according to the Jonathan Dimbleby biography of the Prince”.
Well, that is to say that it is “extremely hard to understand” if you do not know how these sick fuck nonces operate. And as such, it is no surprise that Charles also grew up to be a paedophile.
As did Prince Andrew.
Moreover, I should also point out that it was Mountbatten who introduced the vile child-killing nonce, Jimmy Savile to the Duck who in turn introduced him to Prick Charles… And of course Savile’s role in the Royal household was to provide the monsters with little girls & boys.
Therefore it is safe to say that Philip was anything but the “devoted father” that the press are now making him out to be.
PHOTO: Pure sycophantic propaganda and given that the photo of Mia Grace is a fairly recent one you have to question if that is even her 99 yr old Grandad in the picture.
I mean, forget about the old news reels of Phil & Liz playing the happy family with their kids. They were just photo shoots and there are not many of them about either.
In fact, it is fair to say that the emotionally stunted monster has had very little to do with his two eldest children throughout their lives (although there is some evidence of him having a slight affection for Anne) and even less to do with the two younger ones – who are not biologically his (more on that shortly):
PRINCE PHILIP’S no-nonsense approach to life apparently extended to his parenting technique. One particular “bad mistake” with his son Prince Charles has caused them to have a distant relationship, a royal commentator has claimed.
While the structure of Royal Family life meant it wasn’t unusual for the children and Prince Philip to live fairly separate existences, the Duke made “a bad mistake” which meant his and Charles’ relationship remains distant to this day, according to one royal commentator... Source
And the Queen was just as distant towards her four children with Princess Andrew letting it slip that as children, he and his siblings were forced to call their mother “Your Majesty“:
Course, the fact that Philip is incapable of loving anybody at all should be of no surprise to anyone given his own brutal childhood. But as I have been demonstrating throughout this article; all children of the elite monsters are made to suffer unimaginable horror in order to fracture their minds, thus turning them into heartless psychopaths who will in turn continue with the monster-elites warped plans for humanity.
Something that could not be achieved with children that are taught love and humanity.
Now, another piece of propaganda doing the rounds since Philip croaked is that he and the Queen have had a long happy marriage:
And that to me is the funniest and most unbelievable claim to come out of the Duck’s demise.
I mean, the 13 year old Elizabeth may well have been head over heels in love with the Greek import but that did not last long once she became aware that Philip did not feel the same way and that their marriage had been manipulated for nothing more than money and power.
Indeed, it is a badly kept secret that Philip had been constantly unfaithful throughout and before their 73 year marriage to the extent that even the press have been forced to address the situation on a lot more than one occasion.
For example, this from 2017:
Through most of the Queen and Prince Philip’s 70-year marriage, rumours of his alleged affairs have been rife.
Even now, people wonder how he could have left his wife and two young children — Charles and Anne — for a jaunt round far-flung outposts of the Commonwealth in late 1956.
It lasted more than four months, and there was gossip about wild parties. Did it have any foundation? … Source
Of course it didn’t have any foundation… Well not according to that farticle anyway. However, if you did not know before reading this article you will certainly know now that the press is nothing more than a mighty powerful propaganda machine used to manipulate the collective thinking of the masses… In other words, the press is not there to tell us the truth.
However, it should be noted that Patrick Jephson, the former private secretary to Princess Diana is quoted as saying in Tina Brown’s book, The Diana Chronicles, that “the palace only goes to the trouble of denying a rumor when they know it’s the truth“.
And the truth is that Elizabeth was resigned to the fact that their marriage was never going to work or make her happy by the time that Princess Anne was born – after which she banned her husband from her bed.
Course, when their sleeping arrangements became too well known not to comment on, the press once again went into damage limitation mode and claimed that the couple had separate bedrooms because the Queen needed an undisturbed nights sleep in order to properly carry out her Royal duties.
Now that has got to be one of the most bizarre, bullshit excuses that the mighty media have ever come up with! And I will also refer you to the aforementioned quote from Patrick Jephson: “the palace only goes to the trouble of denying a rumor when they know it’s the truth“.
I mean, being Queen cannot be anywhere near as hard as the they would have you believe since Liz is still doing the job at the age of 94!
However, that load of old bollox failed to quash the rumours leading to the claim being repeated in a book written by Nicholas Davies which on its release was said to reveal “a shocking world of royal adultery, passion and betrayal“.
The book stated – as fact, not surmise – that the Duck’s affairs with his cousin, Princess Alexandra and the film star Merle Oberon, not to mention his former Daughter in Law’s mother, Susan Barrantes (among others!), as being the reason as to “why the Queen banned her husband from her bed“.
The actress Pat Kirkwood also instantly spring to mind – although she only indicates that Philip was being a sex pest towards her:
Philip and Kirkwood reportedly met on on seven occasions, and while she has always denied they had an intimate relationship, as rumors of “the prince and the showgirl” ran rampant, she had to beg Philip and the palace to do the same. He never obliged.
Short of starting libel proceedings, there is absolutely nothing to be done,” he reportedly said, according to Michael Thornton, a friend of the actress who is now in possession of secret letters between Philip and Kirkwood. “Invasion of privacy, invention and false quotations are the bane of our existence.
Thornton says Kirkwood told a journalist, “A lady is not normally expected to defend her honor. It is the gentleman who should do that. I would have had a happier and easier life if Prince Philip, instead of coming uninvited to my dressing room, had gone home to his pregnant wife on the night in question...
Now, I find it interesting that the above quotes Michael Thornton as a source because you will recall that he was the former Daily Mail journalist whose article I quoted from earlier stating that Edward VIII had told him that the Queer Mother was in love with him… And once free from the constraints of writing for the MSM, he was no longer gagged.
Nevertheless, the article then goes on to say that:
Biographer Sarah Bradford had no doubts when she plainly labeled Philip an adulterer in her 2011 Elizabeth II: Her Life in Our Times. “The Duke of Edinburgh has had affairs … full-blown affairs and more than one,” she wrote. “He has affairs and the queen accepts it. I think she thinks that’s how men are.”… Source
And let us not forget Penny Knatcbull with whom Philip is said to have started an affair in the late 1970’s or early 1980’s which then continued up until his death, although the press has repeatedly been employed throughout the decades to pour scorn on the rumour.
Ironically, Penny was married to Norton Knatchbull – the grandson of Philip’s uncle, Noncey Mountbatten.
More damning still, the Telegraph reported in an article on the 5th of September 2004, about how Philip had sat “impassively, incensed but silent” when a Journalist from a “Sunday broadsheet” had suggested to the Duke that he might “have a raft of illegitimate children” and that he had enjoyed “a homosexual liaison with Valery Giscard d’Estaing“, the former President of France.
That claim was then repeated in an article published by Town & Country magazine in 2017:
One journalist even went so far as to ask Philip about the possibility of children he had with other women and to suggest that the Duke had enjoyed a “homosexual liaison” with the former President of France, Valery Giscard d’Estaing. Philip did not respond to these questions... Source
Nevertheless, following the breakdown of their marriage in the early 1950’s getting divorced was never ever an option and as such neither the Queer or the Duck had any other choice but to continue with the sham marriage and as such from that point onward they lived very separate private lives, whilst maintaining the deception of a happy couple in public.
Or put another way, the pair simply continued to do their jobs with the utmost professionalism whilst not in particularly even liking each other much let alone love… Something many famous & powerful couples have been doing for centuries, especially in cases where the more famous of the two is either gay or a nonce – or both.
However, you would be very wrong if you were to think that from that point onward the Queer was resigned to just spending her life carrying out Royal engagements while the Duck spent his spare time shagging anything that moved because that certainly was not the case.
After all, she was still only 24 yrs old at the time and had spent her entire life being spoiled and pampered… And with that being the case, she too embarked on a series of affairs – which quite rightly led to both Prince Andrew’s & Prince Edward’s parentage both being called into question.
Don’t believe me?
Well, in that case let me enlighten you by saying that there is only a two year age gap between Charles and Anne – after which Phil & Liz stopped having sex.
There then followed a big 10 year gap before Andrew came along which thinking about it logically would make sense if the Duck was not his real dad… In fact that honour goes to the Queen’s former horse racing manager, Lord Henry Porchester.
Andrew was then followed by Edward – who both have different fathers – four years later. Eddie’s old man is rumoured to be the notorious womaniser, Baron Patrick Plunket (despite him also being bisexual) who was at the time Equerry to the Queen.
Now the murmurings as to who Andrews real biological father was eventually gained so much momentum that the media was once again forced to go into damage limitation mode and address the issue – for instance this one from the Telegraph:
“There are those who persist in believing that Prince Andrew’s natural father was the Queen’s racing manager, Henry “porchey” Porchester, 7th Earl of Carnarvon, suggesting the conception occurred at some point between 20 January and 30 April 1959 when Philip was away on another of his long sea voyages in the Britannia”…
However, with Philip being back in the country by the end of April 1959 he could have – in theory – been Andrew’s dad. Indeed, the press used Philip’s return home to pour scorn on the Porchester rumours.
Nevertheless, there is evidence to suggest that Andrew was born earlier than announced:
For Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, born on February 19, 1960, and whose first name was taken from Prince Philip’s late, long rumored bisexual father, was kept more hidden from public view than virtually any other high ranking, newly born Brit royal baby before him during the 20th century, and certainly afterwards.
Even the recent birth and christening of his great nephew, Archie Mountbatten Windsor, wasn’t shrouded in nearly as much secrecy as his own. Not only was Andrew delivered in complete privacy at Buckingham Palace, but the press wasn’t even allowed at his christening, let alone given access to photos from it.
Once the Queen finally allowed the public a glimpse of her newborn son, rumors soon spread, at least among the cognoscenti, concerning why Her Majesty had kept him under wraps till then. Even as a baby, Prince Andrew looked nothing like his reputed father, Prince Philip, but instead bore an uncanny resemblance to his mother’s confidante, Lord Porchester... Source
And of course, regardless of whether or not Philip was back home in Blighty he was by then no longer in a sexual relationship with his wife.
Worse still, in 1993 The New York Times Magazine exposed the Queen’s penchant for sleeping with her underlings in an article quoting the columnist Nigel Dempster telling the author Christopher Hitchens to “Get hold of a picture of Prince Andrew and then one of Lord Porchester at the same age. You’ll see that Prince Philip could never have been Andy’s father“.
Certainly, Andrew looks nothing at all like Philip and lacks any of the Queens horsey features.
More tellingly still, The Queen did not challenge the aforementioned articles. She did however use the taxpayers money to increase the budget for the Buckingham Palace Press Office.
Then have a read of the following published in the Telegraph newspaper and is one of those type of articles that I mentioned earlier on where you need to read between the lines:
Hugh Euston headed the list of well-born “flirts” that Elizabeth and her friends used to joke about, which also included Lords Porchester and Plunket, among others. Unlike her fun-loving younger sister, Margaret, Elizabeth was painfully shy and cautious and solemn in her demeanour, albeit still attractive.
At parties she could appear something of a wallflower. However, at nightclubs – such as the 400 Club in Leicester Square, where there was a band for dancing, or the nearby Café de Paris, before it was bombed – she could be squired by young men she liked, away from prying eyes.
“She clearly found Hugh Euston, Porchey [Lord Porchester] and Lord Plunket sexually attractive,” recalled a lady-in-waiting to the Telegraph journalist and author Graham Turner, “and they would get the come-hither looks, a fluttering of the eyelashes. You can’t have much going on between you in a Viennese waltz, but there’s the look, the pressure of the hand and, in those days, it wasn’t so commonplace to want the next thing.”
“She clearly found Hugh Euston, Porchey [Lord Porchester] and Lord Plunket sexually attractive”. See what I mean? Of course you fucking do.
Moreover, according to royal researcher Jim Hutchinson, State Papers released in 2009 confirm that in 1959, the [pregnant] Queen and the question as to who her – as yet unborn – baby’s father was likely to be, was discussed in Cabinet on three occasions.
The details of the first of these discussions had been stamped ‘Not to be seen for 50 years’. That is 20 years longer than the standard 30 year rule. The details of the other two discussions have been stamped ‘Not to be seen for 100 years’.
Meantime, four years after Randy Andy’s birth, Prince Ed the Ball was born and just like his older brother, it wasn’t long before his parentage became gossip for the press to pour scorn on:
Among the many scurrilous and untrue rumours that have circulated about the royal family are the following:
Elizabeth also had an affair with the 7th Baron (Patrick) Plunket, deputy master of the royal household. When he died in 1975, she had him buried in the royal family’s private burial ground, and personally designed his tombstone… Source
However, whilst most of those articles ridicule the notion – as you would expect – there are a few that are much more telling:
Queen Elizabeth II is notoriously private, but a fascination with her younger years has renewed with vigor thanks to the BBC series “The Crown.”
Who was Patrick Plunket, and was Queen Elizabeth, as Royal biographer Charles Higham put it, “very probably in love with him?”
After Queen Elizabeth’s coronation, she appointed him Deputy Master of the Household, a role he held from 1954 until his untimely death in 1975. He helped with banquets and receptions and other royal events. Notably, he was there for her when Philip embarked on his four-month royal tour.
Plunket’s cousin, Lady Annabel Goldsmith, told The Sun in an interview: “He adored her from the outset. They enjoyed a very special connection. He was the one member of her staff who could talk to her on equal terms.
“There was an openness and honesty between them based on respect, friendship — and a lot of teasing.”
As The Sun reveal describes their relationship:
He danced with her. He joked with her. He served her and guided her. And when her marriage hit a rocky patch, he comforted her.
In her 92 years, no other man has ever been that close to the Queen, apart from Prince Philip.
In 1975, when bachelor Plunket died from liver cancer aged just 51, the Queen was plunged into grief.
In fact, his death marked one of the very few occasions throughout her reign when Queen Elizabeth has broken with the protocol. She saw to it that he had a royal funeral service at St. James’ palace, attended his memorial service, had a hand in writing his obituary, and had a memorial chapel constructed in his memory in Windsor Great Park, which she still visits.
While speculation remains as to whether theirs was a close friendship or there were romantic feelings at play, one thing is certain – he meant a lot to her. After his death, when asked who would replace him as Deputy Master of the Household, she allegedly replied: “No one will ever replace him.” … Source
Now unfortunately it is a lot more difficult to judge whether or not Plunket is Edwards father because there are surprisingly few photos of the Baron and Rock-Steady-Eddie has inherited his mothers pronounced horsey features.
Nevertheless, take a butchers at the following comparisons:
Hmmm, I certainly wouldn’t rule Plunket out of the running, especially given all of the information that I have now given you… Would you?
And finally, I had to cringe at the way Princess Andrew hoped to use his step-dad’s death to his advantage by giving the press an interview in order to garner public sympathy and receive forgiveness for being a putrid nonce.
However, unfortunately for him, a [presumably] fake response to a Sky News tweet they posted very quickly went viral and thwarted his cunning plan.