As I became more & more well known in and around 2012, I never tried to hide the fact that a little over 25 years ago (1996) I was not what you would call a very nice man, and I had in fact been that way since my late teens.
Nevertheless, my reasoning for being so open about the fact was two-fold. You see, I am happy at the kind of man I had since become and of course the past has a habit of cropping up later on in life and biting you hard on the fucking bum. And as such, I thought that I best get it out there before one of my many haters at the time could come up with something to harm my reputation… Indeed, many tried including the Establishment yet I firmly believe that my integrity remains intact.
In fact, during the course of that period prior to 1996 – following one of quite a few arrests – I did note that on top of police paperwork being filled out by a custody sergeant or an interviewing officer (I can’t remember which) were the words: “Approach With Caution“… But I am not going to dwell on that part of my life or the reasons for me being that way.
However, what changed me as a person (which I hasten to add, did not happen overnight), was the fact that my then 6 month old daughter (Stacey) came to live with me – which given my past up until then raised more than a few fucking eyebrows I can tell you, despite the fact that I have always had a natural affinity with children & animals.
Indeed, no one was more surprised than me when the court awarded me a ‘Residence Order’ (custody) for Stacey, albeit she had been living with me for well over a year when it became necessary for me to apply for one.
Furthermore, despite the drastic change in my lifestyle that gaining custody of a young baby brought about, I think that I did a marvelous job of raising her – even if I do say so myself – and she is without doubt my greatest achievement in life.
Moreover that satisfaction continues to live on now in my role as Grandad to her two boys. In fact these days I get no greater enjoyment out of life than taking my Grandson, Clayton to watch Southend United play.
PHOTO: Football-mad Clayton & me watching the Blues
In other words, it is safe to say that 1996 was the defining year of my life and at which point I began to learn the importance of unconditional-love, patience, tolerance & the understanding needed to raise a child. Moreover, my hair-trigger temper and former violent nature very quickly began to disappear (although to this day Stacey still accuses me of being a moody bastard).
And in turn, it is true to say that all this led to me becoming more compassionate, tolerant & understanding towards other people – especially the poor (since I was now a member), the old & sick, those with different views & beliefs to mine and those less well equipped to deal with life in general… Not that I am now claiming to be a Saint or an Angel because I am far from it.
However, bear with me because I am going somewhere with this.
You see, I am now at a point in life where I can happily sit with the door to my garden open and not even be bothered by – or harm – the moths, spiders and odd wasp that fly in, unless of course they threaten to sting me or my dog Benny – which did in fact happen to me a couple of weeks ago.
Flies on the other hand receive no such mercy – I fucking hate flies… I mean, I probably wouldn’t mind them so much if they were not so irritating, but the cunts won’t leave you alone will they?
Moreover, they are dirty fucking bastard insects living off shit and rotting food. Therefore, it can never be said that nowadays I wouldn’t hurt a fly because I certainly fucking would and indeed I do so often.
PHOTO: A Fly… What is there to like?
So, let me get to the point of telling you all this – “I wish you fucking would Spivey“.
Oi, there is no need for that now is there?
You see, I hold the Monster Elite, Rapists and Child Molesters in the exact same contempt that I have for Flies. In fact, were I given the green light to do so (without consequence) I would gladly execute the sick cunts just as easily as squashing a fly… Indeed, no amount of years spent mellowing would dampen my enthusiasm for the task.
And that is why the death of the Queen brought a big smile to my face… Which to be fair, didn’t last very long. You see, I have been extremely disappointed by the cringe-worthy grief now being afforded – by the general public – to this inherently evil woman.
I mean, you have to wonder what these stupid cunts (and there appears to be an awful lot more of them than I thought there would be) are so lacking in their lives that they are devastated by the death of an evil old crone whom they have – in most cases – never so much as clapped eyes on and who certainly never did anything in her life to benefit them.
Course, it is obvious to me that the MSM, aka the Governments propaganda-wing is in most part to blame for this mass outpouring of grief and to be fair, I have to tip my hat to them. I mean, a life time of thought-control has blatantly left the nation unable to think for themselves… Although – as someone clearly not susceptible to the media mind games – I personally cannot get my head around the fact.
Indeed, it is nothing short of absolute madness… And speaking of which, have a butchers at the following:
And no, that is not a joke… It is in fact deadly serious. You see, for those who don’t know, the above image is referring to Paddington Bear, who appeared in a TV sketch with the Queen during her recent Jubilee celebrations in a concerted effort on behalf of her spin-doctors to portray the Monarch as a lovable, fun-loving old lady.
PHOTO: A screenshot of the Queen taking tea with Paddington Bear
And crazy as it might sound, following Sweaty Betty’s demise people have seized on that spoof tea party and instead of wasting money on remembrance flower bouquets, the daft cunts are wasting money on stuffed bears & marmalade sandwiches instead:
Following the Queen’s death last week, the official Paddington Bear account on Twitter paid tribute to the monarch by repeating a line the character had said in the video: “Thank you, Ma’am, for everything.”
Mourners have since left flowers, cards, and other tributes at locations across the UK to honor the Queen, and due to the sketch, many of these have been Paddington-themed, including soft toys, jars of marmalade, and even sandwiches… Source
You really couldn’t make that shit up!
Furthermore, the following image just goes to further prove what I have just said about the MSM’s overwhelming success in mass thought control, since support for the royal family was at an all time low around the time of her Platinum jubilee:
Pass the fucking sick-bag!
Course, you cannot have failed to notice that once again, there is the bottom-clenching, totally pathetic reference to Paddington Bear in that moronic note: “Hope you are watching & eating your marmalade sandwich”.
And that is all down to the Media who planted that particular Paddington seed on the day after Loopy Liz [allegedly] snuffed it:
See how it works? Of course ya fucking do – being as you are still here, which hopefully means that you too are not susceptible to Media Mind Control. After all, I know for a fact that many of the members of The Wide Awake Club who would no doubt have begun reading this long overdue new article with great interest, will already have now given up reading before reaching this far. And that is because, in reality they couldn’t be less ‘awake‘ if they were in a coma.
Or put another way, These ‘Wide Awake Club‘ Members possess the attention span of a Goldfish – in line with the vast majority of people these days. Nevertheless, enough said about these deluded Muppets for now; but given the subject matter of this very long article, it will be necessary for me to return to the subject of these plant-pots again, very shortly.
Now, in that above referenced Chimp Newspaper farticle (The Chimp newspaper being more commonly known among the plant-pots as being called The Daily Mail) was the following vomit-inducing image, which the Monkey-Kuntz (the Monkey-Kuntz being more commonly known among the plant-pots as being called Daily Mail reporters) claim to have found on Twitter:
And indeed the cunts may well have found the image online; but if they did you can bet a Pound to a Penny that the fucking mind-manipulators planted it there themselves… I mean the non-too-subtle user name of the cunt who supposedly set the ball rolling on this Paddington nonsense is a dead giveaway for starters: @Del666111
Course, it is interesting that such a big fan of the monarchy should carry the number of the beast.
However, if I see that bollox image (or the other one found below) published too many more times in my Facebook news-feed (that will cost me a few friends), non of you could blame me for reverting back to the angry young man I was over a quarter of a century ago… Continuity see – go me.
And of course this second one is another prime example of Media Mind Manipulation, because it is a well known fact among those who have done any research into The House Of Windsor, that the Queer & the Duck couldn’t stand each other and in reality had a deeply unhappy marriage… Albeit in later years after the bitterness had subsided somewhat, they no doubt began to tolerate each other for the sake of appearances.
Course, divorce was always out of the question and as such the pair simply lived separate lives, mostly in separate living accommodation and only met up for posed photo-shoots or when they were both required to attend some bash or another – as well as on their many overseas Junkets (these junkets being more commonly known among the plant-pots as being called “Royal Duty“)… You may well have now cottoned on to the fact that my new favourite term of endearment for the general public is “plant-pots” – having become so around 5 minutes ago.
So, at this point and with the above image in mind it is important that we take a look at Phil & Liz’s sham marriage – of which undoubtedly played a part in turning the Queen into the cold, remote Monster that she became.
You see, the Queen was sexually groomed at a very young age as is the tradition of ALL the monster elite. In fact Princess Elizabeth was first introduced to her future husband when she was just 13 yrs old.
I mean, obviously the press now play down that perverse first introduction by claiming that Philip Mountbatten was assigned by the navy to entertain the 13 yr old Liz and her 9 yr old sister, Margaret – but that is just total bollox because as we know, the press are barred from reporting the true facts of the matter, namely that the adolescent Princess was being groomed.
After all, why on earth would a handsome, charismatic 18 yr old playboy be assigned to look after two children? I mean did the Princesses not have a nanny or did the Navy not have a female Rating available?
Indeed, given the fact that Philip was not even a British citizen at the time, the decision to appoint him as the [unneeded] two children’s babysitter is at best bizarre.
However, this anomaly had absolutely fuck all to do with bad decisions and everything to do with a sinister, highly thought out strategy put into action by Philip’s dangerous, predatory nonce uncle; Lord Louie Mountbatten.
Now remember, when Mountbatten’s sexual deviant of a boyfriend, Edward VIII (the future Queens uncle) abdicated, Nonce Louie was thwarted in his conspiracy to become the real power behind the throne.
Nevertheless, the old adage of: “When one door closes another one opens” became Mountbatten’s motto-of-the-day having quickly recognised that young Princess Elizabeth was now 1st in line to the throne… And not too far into the distant future either, what with the borderline mentally retarded King George VI not being in the best of health.
And with that being the case, Noncey Mountbatten actively encouraged his nephew to pursue a relationship with the 13 yr old child – who was no doubt just reaching puberty. After all, girls back then did not reach puberty until they were at least a couple of years older than girls do today.
In fact there was no end to Mountbatten’s quest to control the Royal parasites:
After playing match-maker to the Queen and Prince Philip many decades before, he (Mountbatten) also attempted to set up Charles with his granddaughter, the Hon Amanda Knatchbull... Source
Yet another case of keeping it in the family… And one that Prick Philip was also keen on:
Marriage between cousins is considered taboo in plenty of places. However, this practice is common and even encouraged in the British royal family. It’s all part of an effort to keep bloodlines “pure” and ensure that all royals marry suitable spouses.
That’s why it comes as no surprise that Prince Charles’s father Prince Philip urged him to marry his second cousin, Amanda Knatchbull. The pair even courted for a while, culminating in the Prince of Wales proposing... Source
PHOTO: Amanda Knatchbull was a ringer for her great, great grandmother, Queen Sticky Vicky.
Nevertheless, it is extremely telling that Mountbatten was present for that first introduction between Phil & Liz and as such it is safe to assume that with such a high rank within the Navy and his connection to the Royal Family, he would have been the one who made the decision for his nephew to play babysitter:
Course, both of the last two photos are very telling. I mean if Phil the kiddie-fiddler had really been assigned by the navy to babysit the two Royal children then why the fuck wasn’t he in uniform?
And I do in fact find that bottom photo extremely creepy given what we now know about the Royal penchant for peadophilia. And so, with that in mind I would also hazard a guess that Philip was sexually abused by his homosexual nonce Uncles since he was put in the care of Louie & George Mountbatten at the tender age of eight.
Yet even if the Duck wasn’t sexually abused by his Uncles he MUST have known by the time that he married Sweaty Betty all about the Mountbatten’s fondness for raping little boys… Which makes it extremely hard to understand why the Queen & the Duck were so keen to leave their adolescent son, Prince Charles in Mountbatten’s care during the 1950’s & 60’s.
“Mountbatten was a strong influence in the upbringing of his grand-nephew, Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, and later as a mentor—”Honorary Grandfather” and “Honorary Grandson”, they fondly called each other according to the Jonathan Dimbleby biography of the Prince”.
Well, that is to say that it is “extremely hard to understand” if you do not know how these sick fuck nonces operate. And as such, it is no surprise that Charles also grew up to be a paedophile… As did Prince Andrew.
Moreover, I should also point out that it was Mountbatten who introduced the vile child-killing nonce, Jimmy Savile to the Duck who in turn introduced him to the newly crowned King of ours, Prince Charles… And of course Savile’s role in the Royal household was to provide the monsters with little girls & boys.
Therefore it is safe to say that Philip & Lizzie were anything but the “devoted parents” that the press are now making them out to be.
I mean, forget about the old news reels of Phil & Liz playing the happy family with their kids. They were just photo shoots and there are not many of them about either.
In fact, it is fair to say that the emotionally stunted monsters had very little to do with their two eldest children throughout their lives (although there is some evidence of Philip having a slight affection for Anne):
As a timid and passive young boy, it says, the Prince [Charles] was totally cowed by his father, who was upset that his son was unathletic and “a bit of a wimp,” used “mocking banter” that brought him to tears “particularly at social gatherings,” and seemed to prefer his more outgoing and “fearless” sister, Anne. As a mother, the Queen was described as detached, busy with her official duties, and deferring to her husband in child-rearing... Source
And Philip had even less to do with the two younger ones – who are not biologically his anyway (more on that shortly):
PRINCE PHILIP’S no-nonsense approach to life apparently extended to his parenting technique. One particular “bad mistake” with his son Prince Charles has caused them to have a distant relationship, a royal commentator has claimed.
While the structure of Royal Family life meant it wasn’t unusual for the children and Prince Philip to live fairly separate existences, the Duke made “a bad mistake” which meant his and Charles’ relationship remains distant to this day, according to one royal commentator... Source
Nevertheless, the Queen was just as distant towards her four offspring with Princess Andrew letting it slip that as children, he and his siblings were forced to call their mother “Your Majesty“:
Indeed, one of the saddest bits of film that I ever saw was a Pathe newsreel which showed Elizabeth and her entourage on a walkabout with a bewildered looking Prince Charles in tow… Sensitive child Charlie would have been around 4 or 5 years old at the time and being clearly nervous he tried to take hold of his mothers hand, only for her to angrily shrug it off… Unfortunately, despite many hours of searching I have never been able to find that film clip again, but if you could have seen the hurt on the little boys face at his mothers rebuttal then I am sure that you too would feel sorry for these poor children of the Monster Elite.
After all, every child is born innocent.
PHOTO: Charles had a miserable childhood
Course, the fact that Elizabeth & Philip were incapable of loving anybody at all should be of no surprise to anyone given their own brutal childhood, but as I have just said; all children of the elite monsters are made to suffer unimaginable horror in order to fracture their minds, thus turning them into heartless psychopaths who will in turn continue with the monster-elites warped plans for humanity.
Something that could not be achieved with children that are taught love and humanity.
Now, all this media old fanny about the couples long happy marriage really began in earnest when the Duck kicked the bucket and below is just another piece of old bollox in a long line of propaganda that has been doing the rounds ever since the evil old bastard croaked it:
Once again, please pass me the sick bucket.
You see, to me this press infatuation with portraying the Queen & her Prince’s 73 year marriage as being some kind of fairy-tale is amongst the funniest and most unbelievable claims to have come out of the Duck’s demise.
I mean, the 13 year old Elizabeth may well have been head over heels in love with the Greek import to begin with but that did not last long once she became aware that Philip did not feel the same way towards her, and that their marriage had been manipulated for nothing more than money and power.
Indeed, it is a badly kept secret that Philip had been constantly unfaithful throughout and before their 73 year marriage to the extent that even the press have been forced to address the situation on a lot more than one occasion.
For example, this from 2017:
Through most of the Queen and Prince Philip’s 70-year marriage, rumours of his alleged affairs have been rife.
Even now, people wonder how he could have left his wife and two young children — Charles and Anne — for a jaunt round far-flung outposts of the Commonwealth in late 1956.
It lasted more than four months, and there was gossip about wild parties. Did it have any foundation? … Source
Of course it didn’t have any foundation… Well not according to that farticle anyway. However, if you did not know before reading this article you will certainly know now that the press is nothing more than a mighty powerful propaganda machine used to manipulate the collective thinking of the masses… In other words, the press is not there to tell us the truth.
However, it should be noted that Patrick Jephson, the former private secretary to Princess Diana is quoted as saying in Tina Brown’s book, The Diana Chronicles, that “the palace only goes to the trouble of denying a rumor when they know it’s the truth“.
And the truth is that Elizabeth was resigned to the fact that their marriage was never going to work or make her happy by the time that Princess Anne was born – after which she banned her husband from her bed.
Course, when their sleeping arrangements became too well known not to comment on, the press once again went into damage limitation mode and claimed that the couple had separate bedrooms because the Queen needed an undisturbed nights sleep in order to properly carry out her Royal duties.
Now that has got to be one of the most bizarre, bullshit excuses that the mighty media have ever come up with! And I will also refer you to the aforementioned quote from Patrick Jephson: “the palace only goes to the trouble of denying a rumor when they know it’s the truth“.
After all, being Queen cannot be anywhere near as hard as the press would have you believe since Liz was still doing the job at the age of 96! That is to say; can anyone tell me what is so hard about ‘Royal Duty’ that prevents a 20 something year old woman sleeping with her husband?
However, that load of old bollox failed to quash the rumours leading to the claim being repeated in a book written by Nicholas Davies which on its release was said to reveal “a shocking world of royal adultery, passion and betrayal“.
The book stated – as fact, not surmise – that the Duck’s affairs with his cousin, Princess Alexandra and the film star Merle Oberon, not to mention his former Daughter in Law’s mother, Susan Barrantes (among others!), as being the reason as to “why the Queen banned her husband from her bed“.
The actress Pat Kirkwood also instantly springs to mind – although she only indicates that Philip was being a sex pest towards her:
Philip and Kirkwood reportedly met on on seven occasions, and while she has always denied they had an intimate relationship, as rumors of “the prince and the showgirl” ran rampant, she had to beg Philip and the palace to do the same. He never obliged.
Short of starting libel proceedings, there is absolutely nothing to be done,” he reportedly said, according to Michael Thornton, a friend of the actress who is now in possession of secret letters between Philip and Kirkwood. “Invasion of privacy, invention and false quotations are the bane of our existence.
Thornton says Kirkwood told a journalist, “A lady is not normally expected to defend her honor. It is the gentleman who should do that. I would have had a happier and easier life if Prince Philip, instead of coming uninvited to my dressing room, had gone home to his pregnant wife on the night in question...
Now, I find it interesting that the above quotes Michael Thornton as a source because he was the former Daily Mail journalist who later published an article stating that Edward VIII had personally told him that the Queer Mother was in love with him… And once free from the constraints of writing for the MSM, he was no longer gagged.
Nevertheless, the afore quoted article then goes on to say that:
Biographer Sarah Bradford had no doubts when she plainly labeled Philip an adulterer in her 2011 Elizabeth II: Her Life in Our Times. “The Duke of Edinburgh has had affairs … full-blown affairs and more than one,” she wrote. “He has affairs and the queen accepts it. I think she thinks that’s how men are.”… Source
And let us not forget Penny Knatcbull (ahhh, the old Knatchbulls again) with whom Philip is said to have started an affair in the late 1970’s or early 1980’s which then continued up until his death, although the press has repeatedly been employed throughout the decades to pour scorn on the rumour.
Ironically, Penny was married to Norton Knatchbull – the grandson of Philip’s uncle, Noncey Mountbatten.
More damning still, the Telegraph reported in an article on the 5th of September 2004, about how Philip had sat “impassively, incensed but silent” when a Journalist from a “Sunday broadsheet” had suggested to the Duke that he might “have a raft of illegitimate children” and that he had enjoyed “a homosexual liaison with Valery Giscard d’Estaing“, the former President of France.
That claim was then repeated in an article published by Town & Country magazine in 2017:
One journalist even went so far as to ask Philip about the possibility of children he had with other women and to suggest that the Duke had enjoyed a “homosexual liaison” with the former President of France, Valery Giscard d’Estaing. Philip did not respond to these questions... Source
So, was Philip bisexual?
In all probability; yes. I mean, history suggests that most of the monster-elite have sexual leaning towards both sexes, which is in all likelihood a consequence of childhood rape and a reason that paedophilia is rife amongst them… Although that prevalent child rape is not just about sexual gratification and does in fact have a lot to do with Satanic worship & child sacrifice.
Indeed, the royal family is reported as being involved in Satanic ritual as far back as Henry VIII – if not further – and as I am sure you are aware, the Royal’s are very much into tradition.
And of course, there are many examples of members of the royal family being either homosexual or bisexual, such as Philip’s uncle/childhood-guardian, Lord Louie Mountbatten who had a long love affair with the Queen’s Uncle, Edward VIII – the Nazi loving abdicated King.
PHOTO: Mountbatten & Edward were long time lovers.
In fact Philips father himself was a flaming la-la, whilst his mother had all the indications of being the product of inbreeding – deafness and profound mental illness:
Queen Elizabeth II‘s husband, Prince Philip the Duke of Edinburgh, had a mother who was born profoundly deaf and a father who was actively, aggressively bisexual. His father, Prince Andrew of Greece, was a disgraced military commander, charged with treason for failure to carry out orders in the Greco-Turkish War (1919-1921) and who was subsequently stripped of his royal titles. Blamed for the loss of Greek territory in that disastrous war, he was imprisoned and sentenced to death. His wife, Princess Alice of Battenberg, arranged for intervention by British King George V, who negotiated for Andrew’s release and rescue.
Andrew lived a lascivious lifestyle, carrying on one affair after another with both men and women, so it is not surprising that he largely ignored his wife and children... source
Nevertheless, as I stated earlier, following the breakdown of their marriage in the early 1950’s getting divorced was never ever an option and as such neither the Queer or the Duck had any other choice but to continue with the sham marriage and as such from that point onward they lived very separate private lives, whilst maintaining the deception of a happy couple in public.
Or put another way, the pair simply continued to do their jobs with the utmost professionalism whilst not in particularly even liking each other much, let alone love… Something many famous & powerful couples have been doing for centuries, especially in cases where the more famous of the two is either gay or a nonce – or both.
However, you would be very wrong if you were to think that from that point onward the Queer was resigned to just spending her life carrying out Royal engagements while the Duck spent his spare time shagging anything that moved because that certainly was not the case.
After all, she was still only 24 yrs old at the time and had spent her entire life being spoiled and pampered… And with that being the case, she too embarked on a series of affairs – which quite rightly led to both Prince Andrew’s & Prince Edward’s parentage both being called into question.
Don’t believe me?
Well, in that case let me enlighten you by saying that the press have hinted at the Queen’s infidelity many times over the years whilst at the same time trying to squash the rumours:
Elizabeth considered cheating on her husband, or at the very least indulged in some emotionally charged heavy flirtation… Source
And of course there is the fact that there is only a two year age gap between Charles and Anne – after which Phil & Liz stopped having sex.
There then followed a big 10 year gap before Andrew came along, which thinking about it logically would make sense if the Duck was not his real dad… In fact that honour goes to the Queen’s former horse racing manager, Lord Henry Porchester.
Andrew was then followed by Edward – who both have different fathers – four years later. Eddie’s old man is rumoured to be the notorious womaniser, Baron Patrick Plunket (despite him also being bisexual) who was at the time Equerry to the Queen.
Now the murmurings as to who Andrews real biological father was eventually gained so much momentum that the media was once again forced to go into damage limitation mode and address the issue – for instance this one from the Telegraph:
“There are those who persist in believing that Prince Andrew’s natural father was the Queen’s racing manager, Henry “porchey” Porchester, 7th Earl of Carnarvon, suggesting the conception occurred at some point between 20 January and 30 April 1959 when Philip was away on another of his long sea voyages in the Britannia”…
However, with Philip being back in the country by the end of April 1959 he could have – in theory – been Andrew’s dad. Indeed, the press used Philip’s return home to pour scorn on the Porchester rumours.
Nevertheless, there is evidence to suggest that Andrew was born earlier than announced:
For Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, born on February 19, 1960, and whose first name was taken from Prince Philip’s late, long rumored bisexual father, was kept more hidden from public view than virtually any other high ranking, newly born Brit royal baby before him during the 20th century, and certainly afterwards.
Even the recent birth and christening of his great nephew, Archie Mountbatten Windsor, wasn’t shrouded in nearly as much secrecy as his own. Not only was Andrew delivered in complete privacy at Buckingham Palace, but the press wasn’t even allowed at his christening, let alone given access to photos from it.
Once the Queen finally allowed the public a glimpse of her newborn son, rumors soon spread, at least among the cognoscenti, concerning why Her Majesty had kept him under wraps till then. Even as a baby, Prince Andrew looked nothing like his reputed father, Prince Philip, but instead bore an uncanny resemblance to his mother’s confidante, Lord Porchester... Source
And of course, regardless of whether or not Philip was back home in Blighty he was by then no longer in a sexual relationship with his wife.
Worse still, in 1993 The New York Times Magazine exposed the Queen’s penchant for sleeping with her underlings in an article quoting the columnist Nigel Dempster telling the author Christopher Hitchens to “Get hold of a picture of Prince Andrew and then one of Lord Porchester at the same age. You’ll see that Prince Philip could never have been Andy’s father“.
Certainly, Andrew looks nothing at all like Philip and lacks any of the Queens horsey features.
More tellingly still, The Queen did not challenge the aforementioned articles. She did however use the taxpayers money to increase the budget for the Buckingham Palace Press Office.
Then have a read of the following published in the Telegraph newspaper and is one of those type of articles where you need to read between the lines:
Hugh Euston headed the list of well-born “flirts” that Elizabeth and her friends used to joke about, which also included Lords Porchester and Plunket, among others. Unlike her fun-loving younger sister, Margaret, Elizabeth was painfully shy and cautious and solemn in her demeanour, albeit still attractive.
At parties she could appear something of a wallflower. However, at nightclubs – such as the 400 Club in Leicester Square, where there was a band for dancing, or the nearby Café de Paris, before it was bombed – she could be squired by young men she liked, away from prying eyes.
“She clearly found Hugh Euston, Porchey [Lord Porchester] and Lord Plunket sexually attractive,” recalled a lady-in-waiting to the Telegraph journalist and author Graham Turner, “and they would get the come-hither looks, a fluttering of the eyelashes. You can’t have much going on between you in a Viennese waltz, but there’s the look, the pressure of the hand and, in those days, it wasn’t so commonplace to want the next thing.”
“She clearly found Hugh Euston, Porchey [Lord Porchester] and Lord Plunket sexually attractive”.
See what I mean? Of course you fucking do.
Moreover, according to royal researcher Jim Hutchinson, State Papers released in 2009 confirm that in 1959, the [pregnant] Queen and the question as to who her – as yet unborn – baby’s father was likely to be, was discussed in Cabinet on three occasions.
The details of the first of these discussions had been stamped ‘Not to be seen for 50 years’. That is 20 years longer than the standard 30 year rule. The details of the other two discussions have been stamped ‘Not to be seen for 100 years’.
Meantime, four years after Randy Andy’s birth, Prince Ed the Ball was born and just like his older brother, it wasn’t long before his parentage became gossip for the press to pour scorn on:
Among the many scurrilous and untrue rumours that have circulated about the royal family are the following:
Elizabeth also had an affair with the 7th Baron (Patrick) Plunket, deputy master of the royal household. When he died in 1975, she had him buried in the royal family’s private burial ground, and personally designed his tombstone… Source
However, whilst most of those articles ridicule the notion – as you would expect – there are a few that are much more telling:
Queen Elizabeth II is notoriously private, but a fascination with her younger years has renewed with vigor thanks to the BBC series “The Crown.”
Who was Patrick Plunket, and was Queen Elizabeth, as Royal biographer Charles Higham put it, “very probably in love with him?”
After Queen Elizabeth’s coronation, she appointed him Deputy Master of the Household, a role he held from 1954 until his untimely death in 1975. He helped with banquets and receptions and other royal events. Notably, he was there for her when Philip embarked on his four-month royal tour.
Plunket’s cousin, Lady Annabel Goldsmith, told The Sun in an interview: “He adored her from the outset. They enjoyed a very special connection. He was the one member of her staff who could talk to her on equal terms.
“There was an openness and honesty between them based on respect, friendship — and a lot of teasing.”
As The Sun reveal describes their relationship:
He danced with her. He joked with her. He served her and guided her. And when her marriage hit a rocky patch, he comforted her.
In her 92 years, no other man has ever been that close to the Queen, apart from Prince Philip.
In 1975, when bachelor Plunket died from liver cancer aged just 51, the Queen was plunged into grief.
In fact, his death marked one of the very few occasions throughout her reign when Queen Elizabeth has broken with the protocol. She saw to it that he had a royal funeral service at St. James’ palace, attended his memorial service, had a hand in writing his obituary, and had a memorial chapel constructed in his memory in Windsor Great Park, which she still visits.
While speculation remains as to whether theirs was a close friendship or there were romantic feelings at play, one thing is certain – he meant a lot to her. After his death, when asked who would replace him as Deputy Master of the Household, she allegedly replied: “No one will ever replace him.” … Source
Now unfortunately it is a lot more difficult to judge whether or not Plunket is Edward’s father because there are surprisingly few photos of the Baron added to the fact that Rock-Steady-Eddie has inherited his mothers pronounced horsey features.
Nevertheless, take a butchers at the following comparisons:
Hmmm, I certainly wouldn’t rule Plunket out of the running, especially given all of the information that I have now given you… Would you? They certainly share the same nose.
Therefore, it is as plain as the nose on Prince Edwards face that his mother & presumed father had anything but the fairy-tale marriage now being touted in the press.
And if more proof were needed, then consider this; you will have often read in the brown-nosing press about Little Bald Willie & Kate Gold-Digger Smiff (along with all the other royal parasites) fucking off abroad on holiday together, but you will never have read the same about Liz & Philfy.
And whilst it is widely reported that Bizzy Lizzie likes to spend her summer holidays at Balmoral Castle, that is not to say that the Duck of Edinburgh is there with her – although more clever worded mind manipulation by the MSM journalists inevitably leads the plant-pots to believe this to be the case.
For instance and as coincidence would fucking have it; on September 11th – three days after Liz allegedly kicked the bucket – the upmarket magazine, ‘Town & Country‘ published an article about the now deceased Monarch’s love for Balmoral Castle… And that article perfectly demonstrates what I have just said about clever wording used by the Presstitutes in order for their readers to reach a conclusion that is not necessarily true:
The royal family is nothing if not consistent. At the end of every summer, Queen Elizabeth makes her annual pilgrimage north to Scotland for a multiple week-long holiday at Balmoral Castle.
There is no mention of the Duck accompanying the Mrs whatsoever, or anyone else for that matter. However, the wording of the articles opening gambit: “The Royal Family is nothing if not consistent” will suggest to the plant pots that the sentence is referring exclusively to the Balmoral summer holidays, thus leading them to conclude that Liz does not holiday there alone – when in reality the sentence is a sweeping reference to the Windsors lives in general terms.
Neither does that opening paragraph tell us how many weeks “the hard working Monarch” takes for her summer vacation although the cryptically worded “multiple week-long holiday” will obviously translate two ways to their plant pot readers.
You see, the really, really dim plant pots with very limited power to understand words will conclude that Q.E II only takes one week of the year for her R & R… How very fucking noble of her.
However, the more astute plant pots who have a slightly better capacity to understand words – as long as there are not too many of them in a row of course – will conclude that the Queer does not adhere to a set number of weeks for her jaunt to Scotland, but her vacation will typically last for somewhere between 2 – 4 weeks… How very, very fucking noble of her.
Now I can glean all of that information from the first paragraph alone, but I bet that more than a few of you are of the opinion that I am reading too much into it… I’m fucking not.
After all, you do not do this shit for as long as I have (well over 10 years in my case) and not cotton on to how these shysters work… I mean, if you don’t then the time to jack it in would have been a good 7 or 8 years ago in regards to myself.
Fortunately – and I am not trying to blow my own trumpet here, mainly because I have a bad back and can’t reach – I usually cotton on to things very quickly, especially in regard to anything underhand… Which is particularly applicable to the National Press whose sole purpose exists to deceive.
Furthermore, I have long been aware as to the power of words (certainly for many, many years before I started this shit and that is something that I have used many times to my advantage throughout my life), and how they can be set out and used in such a way as to manipulate or confuse – despite the layout of the sentence appearing to make perfect sense to the reader in regard to the latter… But just so long as ya know, y’know; it ain’t called ‘Spelling‘ for nothing.
Now, I will at this point admit to waffling on a bit. However, there is a good reason for me doing so. You see, a few hours prior to me starting this article I had decided to write another book about the Queen & Co, following the success of my last effort: Monsters In The Palace, which I am pleased to say is still selling well… Especially so at the moment.
And, having decided upon that course of action, you may be pleased to learn that this very long article will form the basis of that book, although in order for it to do so the narrative will require a lot of chopping around & editing, as well as adding a lot of extra content to what will appear here.
Therefore, the more words I write here, the easier the task of putting a book together becomes – up here for thinking, down there for dancing… Besides, the more I waffle on, the more my writing becomes more like me and you having a one on one conversation, don’t you agree?
No? Well fuck you then!
Nevertheless, with more words the better being my motto of the day, bearing in mind that it takes an awful fucking lot of them to fill a book, I will now explain to you why I am right about that opening chapter published in the Town & Country magazine being written in such a way as to deliberately deceive, whilst at the same time putting a stop to your hurtful accusations of me “reading too much into it“… After which, we can all be friends again.
Now, I will remind you that the opening sentence is nothing more than a cheap ploy written in such a way as to con the plant pots into believing that Lizzie is accompanied to Scotland by her loving husband and adoring family.
In fact, if that was the case then it would be piss poor journalism and Town & Country magazine most certainly do not employ piss poor, second rate hacks… Yet this one is very cryptic about the length of time that the Queen spends there.
I mean even the most junior royal correspondents would instantly know that: “The monarch traditionally spends 12 weeks at her Scottish retreat every summer and the castle is open to the public for the rest of the year“… Source
And that is considerably longer than “a multiple week-long holiday“, by anyones standards.
But as I say, that first paragraph quite clearly mentions no one else joining Bizzy Lizzie on the holiday, which has been the case for many, many years being as her marriage was a sham and her children don’t like her… Well mummies boy Princess Andrew might have a slight affection for her, but he is clearly still sulking at the moment because Liz had finally realised that even the plant pot public are not daft enough to forgive the greedy nonce and as such she was refusing to let him rejoin the gravy train.
Nevertheless, the article then continues:
“If you’ve never heard of the royal country home, which is also featured on a recent season of The Crown, read on for everything you need to know about the centuries-old castle that Tony Blair once called “freaky.” Princess Eugenie, on the other hand, describes it as “the most beautiful place in the world.”
And of course you would have to be a really, really retarded plant pot to have never heard of Balmoral, but the author already knows that but uses it as an excuse to hint at there being something extremely sinister about the place… I mean, if the evil Satanic cunt, former Prime Mincer Tony Blair describes the castle as “freaky” then you just know that there is something seriously remiss about the place… Princess Eugenics on the other hand will be one of those who suffered horrible abuse in childhood at the hands of the monsters, and as such, to her fractured mind it probably is; “the most beautiful place in the world.”.
The article then continues:
“Balmoral Castle in Scotland, where Queen Elizabeth spends her summer holiday, is widely thought to be the monarch’s favorite residence. “I think Granny is the most happy there. I think she really, really loves the Highlands,” described her granddaughter Princess Eugenie in the recent documentary Our Queen At Ninety.
And once again, the author has reiterated that the Queen spends her Balmoral holibobs on her todd… Else the sentence would read: “Balmoral Castle in Scotland, where Queen Elizabeth & her husband spend Their summer holiday, is widely thought to be the monarch’s favorite residence.
“Free from public duties, the monarch can relax and spend time with her family members, who also often make the trip”.
Now at this point, the author has upped the propaganda by stating that Balmoral is somewhere that the Queen can; “spend time with her family members, who also often make the trip”.
Yet once again there is no specific mention of the Duck being one of the family members and in all probability is a reference to Princess Eugenics whom the author has already quoted twice… Course, once again the author is very cryptic in her timeline; “who also often make the trip”, and is once again open to interpretation.
Tellingly, the article then shows a photograph of Prick Philip and Prickcess Anne hosting a Balmoral barbecue… And once again this photo is nothing more than an attempt to convince the plant pots that Philip is always there too… Although the magazine has had to use a photo from 1972 to make the point:
Indeed, photos of the family at Balmoral are very rare and those that do exist are nothing more than staged photo shoots to try and convince the plant pots – past & present – that all is hunky-dory in the royal household.
Indeed, the timing of the above photo is suspect since there was at that time, many rumours as to who was really Andrew’s biological father and it is quite significant that the Duck is the person chosen to hold the baby.
Course, Balmoral was also a favourite haunt on Queen Victoria:
Queen Victoria, thought by many to be such a straight laced lady and her guests regularly used large quantities of cocaine and heroin. The royal summer residence was Balmoral and this was the site of frequent drug use, and one has to wonder what else… Source
Nevertheless, the brown-nosing bollox article then carries on and on in a vain attempt to prove us doubters wrong about the Queen and Phil the Duck, not holidaying at Balmoral together. But all the same, I do find myself wondering what it is about the darkly Satanic holiday castle that compelled Liz to spend her summer holidays there throughout the course of her 73 year marriage… Which also brings me back to Paddington Bear:
“Thank you for always being there”!!!
HUH? Where the fuck is “there“?
Is this perhaps in reference to Sweaty Betty’s last 70 odd rather boring summer holidays spent at the cold, damp DARKLY SATANIC Balmoral Castle? After all, and as we have seen, the evil cunt Tony Blair thinks that Balmoral is “freaky”, so you just know that there must be something DARKLY FUCKING SATANIC about the place… Yet for some strange reason, the Darkly-Satanic Queen loved the fucking Gothic castle.
Although I should just point out for the newbies reading this that I am joking about the above Paddington shite being in regard to the length of time our former Queenie spent at Balmoral.
Yet you would expect any normal OAP of Lizzies age to take full advantage of the benefit system and at least have booked a fortnight in Bridlington or Scarborough for a change.. But no, for Liz it was always Balmoral
And talking of Princess Andrew – which I wasn’t – he appears to be shamelessly using his mothers death as a way to ingratiate himself back into the general public’s good books:
And whilst the press tried to make out that just about every member of the ‘family’ was seen to shed a tear in public, I certainly never saw any evidence of such… Except of course from Princess Andrew of Smug-Bastard.
Indeed, he went proper out of his way to try and endear himself to the general public:
Albeit his pathetic attempt to cry looks more akin to the quivering lip of a toddler who has just been told off.
But at least he gets to retain his titles:
Mind you, neither did the large crowds stood watching him stop the sleazeball from inappropriately touching his daughter as he supposedly bent down to look at the flowers left by the public in tribute to his mother:
And trust me, those screenshots do not do justice to the sleazy way he kept his grubby hand on Princess Eugenics… Furthermore, the way that she did not react at all would suggest that she is used to such fondling.
Mind you, that sick display was not shown on the news. You see, the videos used in the media cut off Andrews smash & grab before he reaches Eugenics arse and as such, it was again down to a member of the public to post an independently filmed clip of the sick display.
But getting back to it and of course, Randy Andy would not have joined his mother at Balmoral anyway because there is no longer fuck all to do once you have spent the first couple of days at the remote Castle… Certainly he did not like his cold, unloving, remote mother enough to spend more than a couple of hours in her company… Despite the Queen paying his hush-money for his noncing escapades:
And this is where the the National Press journalists come unstuck a bit. You see they are now so smug, over-confident & conceited in their ability to manipulate public opinion that they will publish any old bollox these days whilst blatantly ignoring what their predecessors have published in the past.
Mind you, to be fair it is not hard for the cunts to get away with continually contradicting themselves where the plant pots are concerned because – like I am continually saying – the population has become so worn down that we have now reach the point of apathy.
And as a consequence, the only news that matters is the news that is being reported on today – hence the plant pots are now, by and large broken-hearted by the Queen’s death for no other reason than the Monster-Elites mighty propaganda machine, AKA the MSM has told them that they have to be.
And trust me, that is just one of hundreds of press articles telling us that we should be heartbroken by the Queen’s demise… To which of course, not many plant pots have the bollocks to stand up and say; “good riddance”.
In fact one deluded old tart even went on record as saying that viewing the Queer’s box was better than having her kids!
Her kids must be so proud of her!
Yet, can you really believe that these nutters queued up to 12 hours just to file past a closed coffin?
Unless of course you are Gay Philly Schofield and his sidekick Hollie Willobooby – the presenters of the TV show “Good Morning”… They didn’t queue.
And fuck me, didn’t that just grind the gears of the Great British plant pots… Although once again, it was the Media who cajoled them into being angry:
The retailer confirmed that they had extended the 41-year-old presenter’s contract with them following the uproar surrounding allegations she and Phil ‘skipped the queue’ to see the Queen lying in state last week – claims they both strongly denied.
Holly and Phil have been the subject of online abuse in the wake of the claims and an online petition to have the duo fired from their lucrative presenting roles has hit more than 66,000 signatures in six days... Source
Course, the Monkey-Kuntz were happy to print the pairs claim that they did not intentionally jump the queue, but we all know that they did and the Chimps made sure of the fact:
In fact it all got so pathetic that I was pleased to see that there are still a few of us about willing to be the voice of reason.
Take this fella for instance:
Although I suspect that a few people wish they hadn’t wasted their time queuing.
This fella for instance:
Yet there can be little doubt that the media has cast a spell over the nation because prior to the 8th of September, nearly 50 % of the UK population was in favour of getting rid of the royal parasites.
Therefore, it is lucky for the plant pots that there are still some of us who don’t forget.
For instance, as previously stated, the Monkey-Kuntz at the Chimp are now telling us what a wonderful mother the Queen was and how she was absolutely adored by her children whilst conveniently forgetting what King Charlie had to say about her in his 1994 authorised biography:
Yet even now, as a doting great-grandmother, the Queen has never been able to shake off wounding criticism, inflamed by Prince Charles himself in his 1994 authorised biography, that as a mother she was remote.
He bitterly recalled a childhood during which the nursery staff, not his ’emotionally reserved’ parents, were the people who ‘taught him to play, witnessed his first steps, punished and rewarded him, helped him put his first thoughts into words’...
… Mrs Rhodes believes the criticism, which has hurt the Queen very much over the years, is simply a misinterpretation of her undemonstrative style as a mother.
We understand the Queen was ‘wounded’ by a cruel observation from an unnamed lady-in-waiting, in a 2002 biography marking her Golden Jubilee, that: ‘It has always been dogs and horses first, even before the children.’… Source
And yet despite young charlie feeling unloved and rejected by his parents, the Royal couple came up with a plan of action to resolve the problem – as I have previously stated: They sent him to live with his paedophile Uncle Louie Mountbatten.
PHOTO: Charles doesn’t look too comfortable in the company of his sinister looking uncle does he?
Course, after leaving Charlie at the mercy of the nonce did they then welcome the damaged youngster back into the fold?
Did they fuck, they packed him off to a tough boarding school where he was often beaten up by his piers:
“Trying to toughen him up, Philip sent Charles to his own alma mater, the famously difficult boarding school Gordonstoun in a remote part of Scotland. (Every morning began with an ice-cold shower.) However, when Charles fell sick there with the flu in 1957, the Queen chose to write him a letter before embarking on a royal tour of Canada, rather than visiting. Sadly for Charles, history repeated itself four years later, when she stayed on tour in India rather than visiting him during another bout with illness”… Source
Indeed, even the manner in which the Queen gave birth to her first three children is controversial:
“The monarch was reportedly put into a state called ‘twilight sleep’ during labour, where she was given an anaesthetic and the baby born using forceps. The controversial technique is no longer used today. Indeed, when Her Majesty welcomed her fourth child, Prince Edward, she chose another method of delivery.
‘Twilight sleep’ was first used in 1903 by the German doctor, Karl J. Gauss, who gave labouring women a combination of morphine and scopolamine”.
Well the cunt would be fucking German, wouldn’t he… Carry on:
“According to Yahoo.com, the cocktail of drugs caused women to be in a state of wakefulness and sleep, which is how the term ‘twilight sleep’ came about. “After being drugged, the women would be so in and out of consciousness that the doctor would then take the baby out with forceps.”
It’s said that the process caused unpleasant side effects for both mother and baby.”… Source
Course, the Press are also now waffling on about Lizzie’s love for her grandchildren & her great-grandchildren, one of whom – Prince George – is now lauded in the press as being “super adorable” following some old bollox about referring to his Great Grandma-ma as “Gan Gan“… At least that is what Georgie boy calls her according to his mother, Kate Gold-Digger-Smiff:
“George is only two-and-a-half and he calls her ‘Gan-Gan.’ She always leaves a little gift or something in their room when we go and stay and that just shows her love for her family.”… Source
As if the Queer leaves a gift in their bedroom… I mean, why the fuck would Will & Kate even need to spend the night in the Queers gaff?
Yet as I have previously evidenced in the past, the Queen did not visit baby George at nearby Kensington Palace until he was 2 weeks old and even then she stayed less than half hour.
However, the brown-nosing press seem to have forgotten that it was allegedly George who started the Gan-Gan bollox:
Mind you, I very much doubt that it was “Eagle-Eyed fans” who spotted the broach in question and instead I rather suspect that it was just more made up old bollox courtesy of the Monkey-Cunts.
After all, they did tend to go on and on about the Queer’s generosity – all very much in the same vain… And on the same day to boot:
Fuck me, I am getting through some sick bags here!
Yet more tellingly still is that of Prince Harry’s children. You see, officially the Queen only met Harry’s first born, Archie, 2 days after he was born in 2019… But only then because Ginger Pubes and Meg made the effort to take the baby to see Great-nana:
The Queen first met Archie on 8 May 2019 at Windsor Castle. Along with her husband Prince Philip, the monarch was pictured doting over her newborn great-grandson beside Duchess Meghan’s mother Doria Ragland.
The Queen did not then see Archie again until over 2 years later in June 2022, where she also met his 1 year old sister, Lillibet for THE FIRST time:
It’s also believed that Her Majesty met Archie and Lilibet together in Windsor during her Platinum Jubilee celebrations in June this year... Source
However, you will notice that the above does not actually state as fact that the Queen finally met her great-grandaughter for the first time earlier this year and I personally doubt that the introduction ever took place.
Yet it wasn’t just her husband & children that our cold hearted, hate-filled, emotionally distant Sovereign “adored”… At least not as far as the Monkey-Kuntz would have you believe:
“Beloved Cousins”… BELOVED FUCKING COUSINS!!!
Have these arse-licking sycophants forgotten about Sweaty Betty’s first cousins, Nerissa & Katherine Bowes-Lyon who were both nieces of the Queer Mother. The following was written in 2012 by the now deceased historian, T Stokes:
The Queen’s cousin Nerissa was 22 and the Queen’s look-alike cousin Katherine was 15 when they were sent to the grim Royal Earlswood Mental Hospital. Both were severely handicapped and virtually unable to speak. They were said to have a mental age of six.
Cousin Nerissa is now deceased but cousin Katherine, aged 86, is still alive as of 2012, although severely mentally retarded. She is neglected and never visited.
Burke’s Peerage which records the “who’s who” lineage of the British aristocracy, recorded false information that the first cousins of Queen Elizabeth II died in 1940 and 1961.
Despite the Queen’s fabulous wealth, she spent not one penny on cousin Nerissa’s burial. Nerissa was buried like a pauper in an unceremonious grave marked by a 6-inch-high plastic tag bearing a serial number and the name ”Bowes-Lyon”.
Cousin Katherine who spent decades in the Royal Earlswood Asylum, was moved to Ketwin House for the mentally disabled. Following allegations that male staff members were washing female patients, Ketwin House was forced to shut down. Witnesses found bruises on Katherine’s hand and hip.
Despite the Queen’s fabulous wealth, she spent not one penny to keep her cousin Katherine at Ketwin House. The cost ? About 770 pounds per patient per year. According to a former staff member, Katherine is alert, understands what she’s being told and communicates by pointing and smiling. Not one member of the Royal family has visited her in 60 years.
It turns out that the Queen’s mother also had cousins who were locked away in the same mental institution on the same day in 1941 as Nerissa and Katherine.
An ‘out of sight, out of mind’ approach to family members with “embarrassing” problems like mental illness and epilepsy is nothing new in the royal household.
In 1905, George V (Of name change fame) and Queen Mary had a son, Prince John. Until the age of four, Prince John was just as much in the spotlight then as Prince William was in 1986 at the age of four.
When Prince John suffered his first epileptic fit, his royal parents excluded him from official family photographs. He wasn’t even allowed to attend his own father’s coronation as King of England in 1911. In 1917, the King hid his epileptic son by sending him to die in an isolated farmhouse. John never saw his parents again. He died two years later – reportedly in his sleep.
Another propaganda Oscar winner, The King’s Speech, focused on the Queen’s father and his speech impediment. There was no mention in the movie that the cause may have been from generations of royal inbreeding.
Monarchy blockbusters are designed to sell the image of the filthy rich royals as sensitive, caring, human and deserving of adoration and taxpayer support. No one would dare make a Hollywood movie about the King’s nazi brother, Edward VIII who abdicated.
PHOTO: (left) the mental defective Katherine Bowes-Lyon – (Right) Note how much the then Princess Elizabeth looks like her 1st cousin Katherine and look at the unnatural way that the Queen Mother is clutching her daughters developing breast.
But as I said earlier, the Queer Mother has also been publicly accused of being a paedophile.
“We were involved in and spoke at the UK Rally Against Child Abuse in Trafalgar Square last Saturday (7 Aug 2010). Filmmaker and child abuse survivor Bill Maloney opened the Rally with a rousing speech in which he committed treason under Nelson’s column declaring that the Queen Mother was a paedophile. Diana had apparently declared to a close friend that she was evil. Her footman, who had previously been a butler to the Queen, was a convicted child sex offender who used to groom his victims by taking them to parties with the Queen Mother at Clarence House” – Spokesperson for UKRACA
Course, that would explain why the old soak surrounded herself with other nonces – Back Stairs Billy (Google him) and Paul Kidd, to name but two:
A paedophile royal butler who took one of his victims to tea with the Queen Mother was jailed today for a minimum of six years.
Described by police as a “brilliant groomer”, Paul Kidd, 55, of Stalybridge, Greater Manchester, had pleaded guilty to a string of sex offences at an earlier hearing... Source
And of course, it goes without saying that Lizzie loved “all creatures great & small“… Although the Monkey Kuntz did feel the need to say it:
Course, that headline brought back memories of Prick Edward beating his dog with a stick and also kinda made me wonder if they were referring to that most majestic of animals; the Tiger.
I fucking love Tigers, I do:
PHOTO: The dead Tiger that the Queen watched her husband murder.
And let us not forget the Queen passion for horse racing:
Horses used for racing are forced to sprint—often under the threat of whips and even illegal electric-shocking devices—at speeds so fast that they frequently sustain injuries and even hemorrhage from the lungs.
Pushed beyond their limits, most horses are subjected to cocktails of legal and illegal drugs intended to mask injuries and artificially enhance performance. Many horses—fittingly called “bleeders” by the racing industry—will bleed from their lungs, a condition known as exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage. In an attempt to decrease the bleeding, many horses are given a drug called Lasix or Salix, a diuretic with performance-enhancing qualities.
Not surprisingly, every week, an average of 24 horses experience fatal breakdowns at racetracks across the country, and this number doesn’t even take into account the horses who are discarded by the racing industry when they’re no longer considered profitable. In 2015, in New York alone, more than 250 Thoroughbreds endured injuries or fatal breakdowns during races… Source
Yet the plant pots buy into this ‘Queen had a heart of gold‘ bullshit hook line and sinker, despite it being total bollox
Worse still, I am shocked (and it aint easy to shock me) not to mention dismayed by the huge number of people who consider themselves to be ‘awake‘; yet are [openly] expressing their sorrow at the demise of Sweaty Betty.
I mean, I have long been aware that the majority of those claiming to be clued up are in reality nowhere fucking near to being as such; but fuck me, the evil House of Windsor is base level entry stuff on the path to enlightenment… Un-be-fucking-lievable!
And just to add further insult to injury, 5 days after his mother kicked the bucket Kink Charlie fucked off on a mini-break to Ireland, whilst the rest of us were forced into 10 days of mourning.
Mind you, fair play to him because in doing so Big-Ears managed to brilliantly pull off the fine line between being absolutely devastated & happy as fucking Larry:
“I am here at a time of great personal sorrow as we mark the death of my mother after a life famously dedicated to service,” King Charles said… Source
PHOTO: Broken hearted Kink Charlie greets well wishers in Ireland
But that is enough foreplay, so let’s move on to the main event.
Now, what follows are the names and crimes of 31 dirty sex pests – mostly nonces – closely linked to the Queer & Co and as such is the reason why EVERY SINGLE PERSON mourning the death of one of the most evil people ever to walk this Earth should hang their pathetic heads in shame.
I mean; why would you mourn her given all the readily available information to the Queen’s long association with these depraved sick-fucks? Indeed, you will find that nearly all of the extra information that I have provided on the names listed is sourced from the MSM.
I should also give kudos to those responsible for compiling the list of 108 names (found HERE along with many other sites carrying similar lists of varying length), from which I have selected the 31… Albeit many more will be added for the forthcoming book
And of course, just naming names & their crimes would be very boring and as such I have added considerably much more sourced information, comments & observations, not to mention all of the included photographs… Moreover, by doing so has led to my naming a lot more nonces than the 31 taken from the list.
Say “thank you Christopher“.
CHILD SEX OFFENDERS LINKED TO THE ROYAL FAMILY:
1) Unnamed members of Royal Household, The late Member of Parliament, Geoffrey Dickens, has alleged that the four palace staff abused a Buckingham Palace male employee who was aged just 16 at the time
“A 16-year-old boy was groomed and sexually abused by men at Buckingham Palace while he worked there as member of the royal kitchen staff, it has been claimed.
Hmmm, perhaps he was one of those who went on the summer holiday with the Queen… After all, if he worked at Buck-House then it would follow that he would only be at Balmoral if there was a royal in residence.
2) Queen Mother’s Senior Aides (x4), Christopher Lawler said a group of four senior aides to the Queen Mother sexually assaulted him:
PHOTO: Christopher Lawler
And as we have already seen, the Queen Mother-Fucker is well known for surrounding herself with nonce-cunts and actively took part in the grooming of her then 13 year old daughter Princess Elizabeth at the hands of the well known womaniser, 18 yr old Philip Mountanything.
3) Prince Andrew, Duke of York, child abuse allegation (see also Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell):
And I see no real reason to add anymore at this point, since I will be going into much more detail about the well know allegation later on.
However, an interesting photograph has recently surfaced that indirectly links Epstein & Maxwell much more closely to the Queen than first thought:
PHOTO: Epstein & Maxwell at the Queen’s favorite holiday home
Course, no one seems to have cottoned on to the fact that the photo appears to have been taken after Epstein was released from prison after being convicted of child sex abuse and kinda makes a mockery of Princess Andrew claim to have distanced himself from the nonce-cunt financier following that conviction.
And since the Duck was also photographed there in the Media’s similar attempt to show what a loving & devoted father he was following his death – you have to wonder if the press are trying to tell us something?
Moreover, you also have to ask yourself; why the fuck would a billionaire child trafficker and his sick-fuck side kick want to spend time at the remote DARKLY SATANIC BALMORAL CASTLE… Just putting it out there.
4) Sathya Sai Baba, alleged to have sexually assaulted children for decades:
A spiritual group whose “living god” founder has been accused of sexually abusing young boys has become an accredited partner of the Duke of Edinburgh award scheme, the Guardian can reveal… Source
5) Sir Philip Bailhache, The Bailiff of Jersey (as he then was) is alleged to have manoeuvred to discourage victims of child sexual abuse from testifying about the historical horrors they endured at the former Haut de la Garenne children’s home on Jersey
Bailhache – unsurprisingly Knighted by the Queen – later went on to supervise the Police appointment of a convicted paedophile:
A former senior judge was “not aware” a man was a convicted sex offender when he was admitted to a voluntary police force, an inquiry has heard.
Sir Philip Bailhache, then Jersey’s attorney general, supervised Roger Holland’s appointment to the honorary police in 1992.
Holland had been convicted of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl with learning difficulties in 1986, when he worked for St John Ambulance… Source
PHOTO: Bailhache & Bizzy Lizzie
6) Roger Benson, convicted of sexually abusing a 14 year old girl:
A RETIRED lecturer who did high profile work for the Prince’s Trust charity has been jailed for five years for sexually abusing a 14-year-old girl almost 30 years ago… Source
The Prince’s Trust is a charity in the United Kingdom founded in 1976 by King Charles III, to help vulnerable young people get their lives on track. It supports 11 to 30-year-olds who are unemployed and those struggling at school and at risk of exclusion… Source – Wikipedia.
7) Bishop Peter Ball, prosecuted for child abuse:
HE is known for his unwavering loyalty towards his friends.
But the support Prince Charles is said to have given a senior bishop while he defended himself against allegations of sex abuse is now putting the judgment of our future king in serious question… Source
PHOTO: The new King, again being exposed as a friend to yet another nonce – Peter Ball
Now interestingly enough, the Manchester based lawyer, Richard Scorer – whilst criticizing the Church of England’s “years of institutional cover-up and denial” of child sex abuse – said of Peter Ball that he had found his fellow bishops to be the “perfect accomplices, prepared to turn a blind eye to his abuse over many decades”… Source
And obviously the Queer, up until her death was Head of the Church of England… As is now the case of Kink Charlie the Turd – forgive my Irish accent there.
Furthermore, Scorer also acted for some of the rape victims of John Worboys – the so called ‘Black Cab Racist’. Which kinda makes me wonder if Carrie Symonds – the wife of ex Prime mincer, Boris Johnson – was one of those that Scorer represented.
Yet to me, I still have trouble getting my head around Symonds being one of his victims… I mean, how fucking coincidental can you get? Mind you, she did however take part in a Satanic ‘cult production‘ based on the writings of paedophile occultist, Aleister Crowley.
Which I have no problem getting my head round at all, since ALL of the Monster Elite participate in Satanic worship… Something that does not exist according to the press.
And of course it wouldn’t when you have the likes of Elizabeth Butler Sloss leading inquiries into the matter:
Eventually these and several similar cases led to a much more interventionist approach, but the pendulum began to swing back when more than a hundred Cleveland children were removed from their homes over a four-month period in 1987 after two doctors had diagnosed sexual abuse within the family. An enquiry led by Butler-Sloss LJ subsequently cast doubt both on the accuracy of the diagnosis and on the appropriateness of the social workers’ response. A further push was given to the pendulum in 1992 by Lord Clyde’s report into the removal of nine children from their Orkney homes in dawn raids the previous year on suspicion of sex abuse during satanic rituals: the report said the social workers had failed to keep an open mind... Source
PHOTO: Elizabeth Butler Sloshed.
I mean, in 2011 Butler Sloss was publicly accused of covering up child sex abuse in order to protect the CHURCH OF ENGLAND:
The Home Office has again been forced to defend the appointment of Lady Butler-Sloss to run the inquiry into allegations of historical child abuse amid claims she refused to go public about a bishop implicated in a scandal.
The retired high court judge is reported to have told a victim of alleged abuse that she did not want to include some of his allegations in a review of how the Church of England dealt with two paedophile priests because she “cared about the Church” and “the press would love a bishop”... Source
Course, you will not be surprised to learn that in 1979 the Queen awarded Sloss The Most Excellent Order of the British Empire.
And according to Wikipedia:
She was advanced to the rank of Dame Grand Cross of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire (GBE) in the 2005 New Year Honours.
Moreover, and again according to Wikipedia: On 7 September 2006, she was appointed as Deputy Coroner of the Queen’s Household and Assistant Deputy Coroner for Surrey for the purpose of hearing the inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales.
PHOTO: Butler-Sloss with the Queen Consort, Camilla Parker Bowles.
Mind you, Liz Sloss’s husband was also caught up in a sex scandal when in 1987 the News Of The World newspaper reported that Joseph Butler Sloss regularly had sex with prostitutes… Source
Furthermore, Liz Sloshed is the sister of Sir Michael Havers (father of actor Nigel Havers) who in his role as attorney general, refused to prosecute paedophile spy, Sir Peter Hayman – who also appears on the list and whom I will discuss later.
Nevertheless, in 1994, the MP Virginia Bottomley followed in Butler-Sloshed footsteps by concluding the Satanic Child Abuse was nothing more than a myth.:
Although it fucking does exist. I mean, the NSPCC may well call it “Ritual Abuse” as opposed to “Devil Worship“, but it still amounts to the same thing:
By the end of the 1980s, the label “ritual abuse” had become accepted as a distinct pattern of behavior by many police, journalists, therapists, and social workers. The prefix “satanic cult” was quickly dropped from the term “ritual abuse” in order to make the concept more acceptable to secular audiences, such as trial juries and newspaper readers, who might reject satanic cult conspiracy theories as being too bizarre to be credible... Source
In fact, 4 years prior to that Virginia Bottomley cover up, the question of Satanic child abuse was raised in Parliament:
Some of the responses from the NSPCC’s officers have led to serious concern being expressed. Nine teams have worked, or are currently working, with children who have been subjected to ritualistic sexual abuse. In recent months, four cases have been referred to the society by the police or local authority social services departments.
Responses specify that one, two or 15 or 16 or more children have been involved in a group practising these rituals. One respondent said that up to 20 children could be involved in such ceremonies at any one time.The reports from the society’s officers provide some information about the sick activities that are involved.
Five of the responses refer to children drinking blood or urine, five to the killing or abuse of animals, and five to the invocation of supernatural powers and the use of masks and costumes. In four cases, faeces were smeared on children’s bodies, and in some cases children were held under water.
There have been seven reports of threats made to maintain control of children. In several cases, dolls have been mutilated as part of the ritual. Other bizarre elements are recorded. Some children were made to eat what was said to be part of a human heart, while others were shown what was said to be a baby in a microwave oven.
Seven NSPCC teams said that they had worked with sexually abused children who had described symptoms or given reliable accounts of ritualistic activities, including attendance at events where adults had sex before them or where they had been made to eat faeces or to take part in other disgraceful activities. The work of the NSPCC officers and others involved in helping such abused children is not easy, because the abusers tend to have a psychological hold on the children involved which may make them extremely fearful to talk about their experience to others. Source Hansard
Course, when you consider that the NSPCC had the likes of Princess Andrew & the vile, evil Peter Mandelson fronting their charity it is hardly surprising that they want to play down Satanic Child Abuse:
PHOTO: Peter Mandelson.
I do of course expose Mandelson in my book: The Filthy Rich, after he appeared on a list of Satanic Child Abusers compiled by Dr Joan Coleman. And of course, that list has never been challenged despite the huge number of prominent, household names included therein.
Yet you have to wonder why the Media are always so keen to dismiss this abuse which incorporates child sacrifice? In fact the last time that the media poured scorn on the subject was literally last month, following the Queens death.
And it can be no surprise that the farticle in question came from the Chimp:
Course, my long-term readers may remember that I wrote about this case on my old website, where I expressed my view that the allegations of Satanic child abuse – made by two children – was in fact a psyop designed to draw-in any writers on the subject (of whom there were many) before, discrediting the allegations as total nonsense.
And in doing so, the establishment sent a clear message to those in the “truth movement” that publicly supporting victims of Satanic Child Abuse will not be tolerated by jailing SCA Campaigner, Sabine McNiell for a hugely disproportionate 9 years.
However, I also wrote that I was far from convinced that McNeill was not a willing participant in the psyop… Although obviously she may just as well been a means to an end.
Course, as I stated earlier the European Royal Family have been influenced and practiced the occult for centuries.
In fact the Queen Mother has been listed as a disciple:
It’s not just the royals of the past that engaged with spiritualism and the occult. King George VI died in 1952, resulting in Queen Elizabeth II taking the throne at the age of 25. The following year, the Queen Mother, Queen Elizabeth II, and a few other high-ranking royals reportedly met with a medium named Lilian Bailey.
And indeed, Queen Elizabeth the 1st – the daughter of the Satanic Henry Vlll & Anne Boleyn – was a keen practitioner of both the black arts and numerology. In fact she consulted her ‘wizard’ John Dee in nearly all matters of state
Dee was also rumored to commune with angels and practice numerology, a mystical field of study that searches for a divine connection between certain numbers and events. Queen Elizabeth I is believed to have used his knowledge of numerology in choosing the date for her coronation (January 15, 1559). Dee signed his letters to the Queen with the number ‘007,’ something Ian Fleming would later repurpose in his James Bond books.
An artist named Henry Gillard Glindoni created a painting titled ‘John Dee Performing an Experiment before Elizabeth I’ during the Victorian era. In 2016, an x-ray of the painting revealed that an earlier version included a ring of human skulls in his ‘experiment.’ The discovery raised further controversy about John Dee’s practices.
PHOTO: The picture in question.
And then there was King Charles VI:
Charles VI was known as “the mad” king and was severely mentally unstable. He was obsessed with alchemy and the occult during his reign. One historian wrote that his court was filled with “alchymists, conjurors, astrologers, and quacks of every description.”
Course, they are all unstable but that is beside the point.
And Queen Sticky Vicky is another of Bizzy Lizzies not so long dead relatives who practiced the occult:
It’s even believed that Queen Victoria dabbled in the occult in her grief, which wasn’t uncommon at the time. Seances, hypnotism, and crystal readings were extremely popular. Victorian-era spiritualism mixed religion with other more mystical beliefs.
Yet we are supposed to believe that the Royal Family’s centuries old obsession with the black arts ended with the Queen Mother… Really?
I mean, at one stage speculation was so rife that our new King Charles was forced in interview to deny that he and his family dabbled in black magic:
Charles, 36, in a suave, relaxed manner said he isn’t interested “in the occult or dabbling in black magic” but that he thought that parapsychology, and perhaps alternative medicine, should be investigated with an open mind. He added: “Well, yes, I think I’m becoming more eccentric as I get older, probably.”… Source
Mind you, in that same interview Princess Diana refuted claims that she had an eating disorder – and she was lying too, or at least she was according to the media.
Nevertheless, King Charles’ rebuttal may have come about following the author John Dale’s book: “The Prince and The Paranormal“, which goes into the secret occult activities of the British royal family, especially Prince Charles – as he was then.
Indeed, one of the reasons that the royal family are so interbred is because blood is believed to carry the occult power:
Few people are aware of the immense importance bloodlines play in the upper levels of Satanism. Blood is believed to carry the occult power. Unless a person has the correct blood he or she will not rise to the highest levels of Satanism… Source
8) Peter Bick, child abuse allegation.
Prick Philip’s gay friend, Bick was murdered by former altar boy, Christopher Hunnisett just 4 months after his release from prison for murdering a nonce vicar:
A former altar boy who killed and dismembered a paedophile vicar has been arrested on suspicion of murdering a man believed to have been a friend of the Duke of Edinburgh.
Peter Bick, 57, who shared a love of carriage racing with Prince Philip, was bludgeoned to death in the early hours of Tuesday morning… Source
PHOTO: Peter Bick.
9) Lord Benjamin Britten, questions over relationships with children:
The BBC’s willingness to broadcast a tribute to the one-time Top Of The Pops host (Britten) while, at the same time, ditching a Newsnight investigation into his assaults on young girls, does raise a slight question mark over an even more effusive tribute the BBC is planning for next year…
… But what is unclear is whether [BBC] executives will also acknowledge Lord Britten’s obsession with young boys, many of whom he invited to stay at his Suffolk home.
Though Britten’s fondness for under-age youths was not as predatory as Savile’s behaviour, he is known to have slept in the same bed with at least one youngster, an act which, nowadays, would inevitably cause an outcry… Source
Indeed, it was Sweaty Betty herself who personally encouraged the Nonce Britten to start writing music again after the composer fell into a fit of depression:
When Benjamin Britten was at his lowest ebb, the encouragement to start composing again came from no lesser person than Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, as John Bridcut reveals… Source
PHOTO: Betty & Britten
10) Sir Anthony Blunt, child abuse allegation / Elm Guest House and Kincora boys home
The government finally succumbed to pressure Monday and announced that a public inquiry would examine allegations that at least 10 current and former MPs were accused of abusing children but escaped with little or no investigation into their alleged crimes.
At the center of allegations about a political cover-up is a nondescript Edwardian terraced house in West London. What looked like a small suburban hotel, called the Elm Guest House, was closed down after a police raid in the 1980s amid allegations that it operated as a brothel specializing in underage boys.
Now, what else can I say about Blunt the Cunt?
Well, for starters he was third Cousin to the Queer Mother although some historians have him down as being her illegitimate brother-in-law:
Anthony Blunt (1907-1983) was born the third cousin of Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon who became the wife of King George VI and is best known as the late Queen Mother – the woman that Princess Diana described as evil. This was a good description given that the lady they called ‘The Nation’s Grandmother’ was one of highest satanic witches in Europe.
Blunt’s mother was the second cousin of the black witch’s father Claude Bowes-Lyon, the 14th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne. Blunt and his brothers would go for afternoon tea with the Bowes-Lyons at their London home in Mayfair and he was in the royal, political and Intelligence loop almost from the start.
There is another highly significant aspect of the Blunt story according to the London Daily Mail. The paper reported that he told colleagues that he was actually the secret son of King George V, the brother of Bowes-Lyon’s spouse, George VI... Source
And there is no denying that Blunt certainly had the look of George VI’s other children:
Yet it gets even worse from this point on… You see, as I mentioned earlier Blunt was an extremely dangerous, homosexual paedophile – which as you are about to find out was quite clearly no problem to the nonce infested Windsor family and associates:
The Windsors would have also known that Blunt was a paedophile and it is no surprise to me whatsoever after hearing him named many times that he has turned up on the alleged lists of visitors to the Elm Guest House. The stories have long circulated about his procurement of young boys, mostly from ‘care’ homes, and his paedophile parties.
These include how Blunt would murder children through asphyxiation while they were being raped because of the apparent sexual ‘high’ these sickest of people get from this... Source: As above
Now, after the 2nd world war Blunt worked as a Spy for MI5. However, sometime in the early 1950’s his employers suspected that he was also a member of the infamous Cambridge Spy Ring; who were selling our most sensitive secrets to the Russians.
The Cambridge spy ring was made up of Anthony Blunt, Donald Maclean, Guy Burgess, Kim Phillby and Victor Rothschild.
However, unlike his fellow traitors, Donald Maclean and Guy Burgess, who had to flee to the Soviet Union in 1951 in order to avoid prosecution – and who were later joined by Kim Phillby in 1963 – Blunt was given immunity from prosecution due to a matter of national security i.e his close connection to the Royal Family and the danger he posed to the parasites should he have been put on trial:
This job of mine really is too easy once you know what you are looking for… The article starts thus:
Anthony Blunt gave his Russian spymasters a collection of Royal letters so compromising, it could have been used to blackmail the Windsors, according to a leading figure in the KGB.
Written by the Queen’s uncles, the Dukes of Windsor and Kent, to their German relatives, the correspondence is likely to show the depth of their Nazi sympathies and would have proved hugely embarrassing had it been released in the Cold War years.
He had always insisted the information he passed to the Russians was ‘almost exclusively about German intelligence services’.
But a Channel 4 documentary has now confirmed that Blunt also made copies of Royal correspondence and passed it directly to the KGB.
It is likely that the Kremlin still holds copies of the letters today.
The betrayal was revealed by Russian spymaster Yuri Modin, formerly controller for the Cambridge spy ring, which included Blunt... Source
Course, even more damning is the fact that the Duck & the Queer would also have known that Blunt was selling our top secret information to the Russians… After all, as our recently deceased reigning monarch Sweaty Betty is briefed on a weekly basis by the heads of MI5 & MI6 and it beggars belief that they would so much as dare to try and withhold such information from her.
And then there is this:
The Royals knew about Blunt’s treasonous background. Army officer Philip Hay went for an interview at Buckingham Palace in 1948 for the post of Private Secretary to the Dowager Duchess of Kent and he said that after they passed Blunt in a corridor, Sir Alan Lascelles, King George VI’s – and later the Queen’s – private secretary, said: ‘That’s our Russian spy’.
Yet Blunt’s career as a Russian Spy was not made public until 1979 when the then Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher was forced to declare the fact to the House Of Commons after overwhelming evidence of Blunts betrayal was leaked into the public domain.
Course, since Blunt didn’t die until 4 years after his exposure you have to wonder; just why the fuck he wasn’t prosecuted at the time – especially, giving mind to the fact that the Germans & Israelis are still pursuing & prosecuting Nazi war criminals to this day… No matter how fucking old they are.
I mean, had Maclean, Burgess & Philby not fled to the safety of Moscow then they would most certainly have been hanged and as such, had Blunt’s betrayal of Britain had also become public knowledge at the time, then the Establishment would have had no other choice than to hang him too.
And of course the same would have applied to the 5th member of the spy ring, Victor Rothschild who was also far too well connected to be exposed until after his death.
Certainly, despite his betrayal to the country both the Queen and the Duck still thought very highly of him.
Which they would have done since Blunt once again saved the Royal Bacon by being dispatched for a second time in order to retrieve another batch of “extremely sensitive & damaging evidence” which was alleged to compromise senior members of the Royal family.
However, this time the mission was for Blunt to buy up dubious photos & drawings of Prick Philip & his sister-in-law, Princess Slaggy Maggie, made by his close friend, the Satanist & society pimp, Dr Stephen Ward – the scapegoat in the Profumo Affair:
The Profumo Affair was one of the biggest British political scandals of the 20th century. John Profumo was the UK’s secretary of state, who had an affair with model and sex worker Christine Keeler. Stephen Ward was an osteopath, artist and soviet ally, who worked with a soviet spy to get Keeler to extract information from Profumo.
Prince Philip was a friend of Ward’s who had painted Prince Philip and Princess Margaret. Ward was eventually charged with “living off immoral earnings” and sold his artworks of the royals to fund his trial. He committed suicide before the end of his trial in 1963. It was believed, although never confirmed that an associate of Philip’s, Anthony Blunt, tried to buy the paintings off Ward to save the reputation of the royals... Source
Course, Philip’s involvement with Stephen Ward undoubtedly goes much deeper than a few bits of pornographic art work. You see, the Duck also attended kinky sex parties thrown by Ward and is even rumoured to have shagged Christine Keeler – the prostitute at the epicenter of the scandal.
Furthermore, Philip’s friendship with Ward is believed to be the reason that the files on the Profumo case are subject to a hundred year gagging order with them not being set to be released for public scrutiny until 2064… Or at least that is what Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber believes.
The following is what he told the Chimp in 2014:
Andrew Lloyd Webber believes the contents of the file are ‘explosive’. Why is he so certain?
‘I can only say my source is totally reliable – it couldn’t be more reliable,’ says the composer peer. ‘Of course, the person in question has not released any details to me, but is at a very high level indeed.’…
Says Lloyd Webber: ‘We could speculate for ever about who and what is in this file, but that is so dangerous. Goodness knows where it could lead.
One name this unhealthy speculation has inevitably – and quite unfairly – thrown up in high places is Prince Philip, who will be 93 in June.
‘That’s precisely what I mean about the dangers of having to speculate when everyone is so fed up with secrecy,’ says Lord Lloyd-Webber.
So could Prince Philip really be mentioned in the secret files? ‘All we know is that Ward and Prince Philip knew each other because he sketched Philip several times,’ says Lord Lloyd-Webber... Source
And obviously Philips involvement would certainly explain the 100 yr gagging order wouldn’t it? Certainly, both the Duck and Ward regularly attended the notorious Thursday Club – as did Anthony Blunt’s partner in crime, the Russian spy, Kim Phillby:
Prince Philip was a member of the exclusive lunch club, the Thursday Club, who were notorious for having wild parties. In the early 60s, there was a photo taken of a man, naked from behind apart from a skimpy lace apron, serving drinks to other club members. It was rumoured to be Philip, and although there was no concrete evidence to suggest it was him, Private Eye magazine referred to Philip for a long time as “The Naked Waiter.” … Source
And since Ward was also suspected of being a Russian Spy it is then safe to assume that he was good friends with Kim Phillby. Ward also treated Anthony Blunt for a bad back and we know that he was great mates with the Duck so we now have evidence of old Phil associating with three Russian spies… Which would not bother the old bastard in the slightest given his Russian bloodline.
Nevertheless, despite turning a blind eye to this espionage and being totally partisan to the Third Reich, the hypocrite Philip along with the rest of the shameless Royal parasites will happily shed [crocodile] tears in public for the millions of British Servicemen & women who gave their lives for our country.
PHOTO: Once you know the truth, their actions are sickening.
And still there is more! You see, our new Kink, Charles of Buggerlugs wrote a letter of support to Blunt the Cunt after he was finally exposed as being a Russian Spy:
Revelations of Prince Charles’s support for Blunt will again raise questions about the heir apparent’s judgement. Charles faced criticism for his support of the disgraced paedophile Bishop Peter Ball.
And of course I have already discussed the nonce Bishop and his close relationship with the new King further up the way.
Nevertheless, the farticle continues:
Ball, the former bishop of both Lewes and Gloucester who died in 2019, boasted of his role as “counsellor to royalty” and would use his ‘friendship’ with the Prince to lure his young victims.
The former bishop was investigated by police in the early 1990s, which resulted in a police caution. In 2015, he was convicted of sexual offences against 17 teenagers and young men and jailed for 32 months.
An inquiry later heard that Prince Charles told Ball in a letter in February 1995, two years after the bishop had accepted the police caution: “I wish I could do more. I feel so desperately strongly about the monstrous wrongs that have been done to you and the way you have been treated.”… Source
PHOTO: The Queer & the Queer
11) Sir Arthur Charles Clarke, child abuse allegations.
The Queen gave Clarke a knighthood In 1988. Ten years later the Independent newspaper wrote the following about the nonce:
On Sunday the newspaper declared Clarke to be a self-confessed paedophile. He was quoted admitting as much, and a Sri Lankan “friend” – head of current affairs at the Sri Lankan Broadcasting Company – alleged that Clarke was still having sex with boys “a few months ago”. Clarke claimed he had not been sexually active for 20 years… Source
12) Robert Coghlan, convicted of importing 109 obscene tapes, 70 containing child pornography.
DIPLOMAT Robert Coghlan was convicted yesterday of smuggling a large consignment of “depraved” child pornography into Britain.
The Aberdeen-born father-of-two was remanded in custody until this morning, when he will be sentenced by Judge Gerald Butler QC, at Southwark Crown Court… Source
And in 1995 Robert Coghlan accompanied Diana: Princess of Wales on her solo visit to Japan.
13) Michael Colvin MP. Prince Charles’s friend, who has since died, is the subject of an allegation that he ‘arranged’ a fire that killed 5 witnesses to child sexual abuse
Now, it is fair to say that I have – in the past – written in great about Colvin (who also died in a suspicious fire) and his long association with the alleged dangerous paedophile, Derek Laud.
Laud was Slaggy Thatchers speech writer and close friends with former Prime Mincer, David Cameron. He also holidayed with Camilla Parker Horseface – now Queen
Consort Oldsort to Kink Charles III:
Tory Big Brother contestant Derek Laud is acquainted with the Duchess of Cornwall, it has emerged.
The 40-year-old, who became the first and only black master of foxhounds in 1999, is believed to have got to know Camilla thanks to their shared love of hunting.
The pair even holidayed together in Tuscany, Italy, last year with Sir John Mortimer’s wife Penny, it was reported to the Sun newspaper.
Course, this would make sense since it has been alleged that Queen Camilla is a dedicated “fag-hag” – which would also make sense really since King Charles has been alleged on a number of occasions by foreign newspapers to be homosexual… For instance, take the following:
The May 19 edition of the Globe Magazine had a cover saying “Charles caught kissing boy toy”, that he has been disowned by William and Kate and that his wife Camilla is demanding divorce. What’s the truth?… Source
Course, divorce is out of the question but that in turn would also explain why the ‘couple’ mostly live apart:
When the Duchess of Cornwall left Scotland and travelled south with a broken leg in plaster the other week, she chose to recuperate not at Highgrove, the marital home she shares with the Prince of Wales, but at Raymill House, her own home 17 miles away.
Three years ago, when she left hospital after a hysterectomy, she did exactly the same thing.
Most married women will find it very strange that a wife should eschew the warmth and helping hand of her husband at such a difficult time, but then, this is a very strange marriage… Source
Nevertheless, the following is what I wrote about Laud & Colvin back in January 2013:
It would seem that Laud had recommended the recruitment of both Neil Hamilton and his fellow Tory MP Michael Colvin as consultants for Strategy Network International – whom Laud also worked for in the 1980’s.
The website Powerbase Info has this to say on the matter:
In the late 1980s and early 1990s Strategy Network International paid for Conservative MPs to visit South Africa. Conservative MPs Neil Hamilton and Michael Colvin both failed to declare the trips on the members register of interests. Current Prime Minister David Cameron also took advantage of a Strategy Network International trip to South Africa in 1989. The trip was offered to the Conservative Research Department by Derek Laud, who was employed by SNI and was later a contestant on the reality tv series Big Brother.
Hold up! Did that just say that our former Prime Minister also went on an all expenses paid holiday to South Africa courtesy of old Laudy boy? Well, well, well.
Furthermore, The Cuthulan Blog (A Scottish Barrister apparently) had this to say about Laud and Michael Colvin in connection to the sexual abuse perpetrated against young boys residing at the Bryn Alyn children’s home:
Now defunct magazine Scallywag covered events at Bryn Alyn in detail, some years ago.The magazine alleged that one of the men referred to is Lord McAlpine, at the time of the offences treasurer of the governing Conservative Party. Another regular participant in the activities at Bryn Clwyd was alleged by Scallywag to be Derek Laud, for years a leading mover and shaker in successive Conservative administrations.
Scallywag alleged that Laud was a sadist, who was particularly violent and without mercy in his treatment of the boys. The magazine alleged that on regular occasions his victims would end up in casualty wards. He was a leading political fixer and adviser to Margaret Thatcher although never an MP; indeed he was pictured waving down to the crowds below from an upstairs window of 10 Downing Street as the Conservatives celebrated their 1988 election victory.
The former children connected with this empire of evil who died in mysterious circumstances may have been murdered by the British security services, the price of their silence their lives. Scallywag alleged that MI5 used to take foreign diplomats etc. to the North Wales homes, give them boys to “play” with, secretly filmed them as they buggered, abused and tortured boys then kept the tapes as evidence.
Michael Brown is one of the very few Conservative MP’s who volunteered to “out” himself as gay. Derek Laud, now standing for parliament, (against Bernie Grant in North London) ran a Pimlico PR agency called Ludgate Communications (later Ludgate Laud) for a number of years which supplied young boys for selected Parliamentarians from children’s homes now being investigated in North Wales. He sometimes did this in cahoots with Ian Greer Associates which has since been scandalised because of the Neil Hamilton Affair and payment for questions on behalf of Al Fayed.
Ludgate Communications was at the very hub of our investigation into the “boys for questions” allegations. At his Pimlico flat, and selected addresses in Dolphin Square nearby, Laud threw paedophile parties and we have one sworn affidavit from a former boy (presently giving evidence in Wales) who claims he was seriously molested (among many others) by Lord McAlpine who was at the time the Tory party’s clandestine fund raiser. It was alleged by this boy and others that Messrs Portillo and Lilley were also guests of Derek Laud. We are assured that this particular volcano is about to erupt, both in North Wales and elsewhere. Michael Portillo has always publicly disassociated himself from Derek Laud, yet here we find him not only acquainted but seemingly in the inner sanctum of private friends.
Colvin was associated closely with several other Conservative ‘people’ on the right wing of the party including Julian Lewis who is said to be involved with a number of international right wing ‘covert’ groups linked with high finance, and arms dealing.
Colvin was also associated with two allegedly corrupt and discredited former Parliamentary Lobbyists, Ian Greer (cash for questions) and Derek Laud (Wikipedia/Derek Laud) (Cash for Knighthoods aka Cash for Rent boys).
In the early months of 2003, just prior to the questionable invasion of Iraq, and working in conjunction with a London-based freelance journalist who had thoroughly double-checked exposures published by the Scottish ‘Sunday Herald’ newspaper, I publicised details of a child-sex ring linked to senior ministers within the Blair government.
I initially published my findings, stemming from discreet leaks from a secret list provided by the American FBI to the ‘Sunday Times’ newspaper, and concomitantly discovered that Tony Blair had issued a gagging order to suppress all further discussion of a scandal that would most certainly have brought a swift end to his administration and made Britain’s collusion in the destruction of Iraq impossible.
And funnily enough, after Laud was confronted by some mush on Twitter with my evidence, Del-Boy dismissed me as a crank and stated that ‘no one believed what I wrote’… Shortly before fleeing to South Africa.
PHOTO: Derek Laud – bless him.
14) Lance Corporal Simon Wyn-Davies,convicted of raping child under 13 [wife also convicted]
Wyn Davies was a Soldier in the Queens Household Cavalry and a proper sick-fuck to boot:
A soldier who was part of a sex abuse ring that held ‘paedophile parties’ has been jailed indefinitely.
Simon Wyn-Davies, 38, claimed he raped children and hoarded child pornography to block out the trauma of his war-time experiences in Afghanistan.
The Household Cavalry soldier told a judge he was suffering from post traumatic stress syndrome following tours of duty in the war-torn country.
The soldier abused a schoolgirl for up to 18 months and had even begun grooming her to become an animal porn star, the judge was told.
He filmed hundreds of indecent videos and still photo images of the molestation and sent the sick material to a string of other perverts by email.
Wyn-Davies even arranged for an HIV sufferer to sexually assault a girl in the back of his Jeep as he drove around Windsor, the hearing at Reading Crown Court was told… Source
15) Jeffrey Epstein, convicted of soliciting an underage girl for prostitution
And obviously we all know about Princess Andrew’s best mate don’t we? Moreover, I suspect most of you reading this will have watched the Queer’s 3rd child repeatedly lie in his BBC car-crash interview – which he gave in an unsuccessful attempt to distance himself from the nonce.
But worst of all, Sweaty Betty contributed to the £12 Million Pounds that the sex pest paid to his accuser for NOT raping her (shagging anyone underage is classed as rape):
The Queen will help Prince Andrew pay £12million to his accuser Virginia Giuffre after they reached an out of court settlement, it has been claimed… Source
How very “noble” of her!
16) Ghislaine Maxwell, alleged ‘high-class madame’ & ‘conspirator in Epstein’s sexual abuse & sex trafficking
Maxwell obviously goes hand-in-hand with Epstein and as such, I have little more to add.
However, Ghislaine was obviously the daughter of Newspaper tycoon Robert Maxwell and like I stated earlier, all of these children born to the Monster Elite are subjected to horrific childhoods:
A 10-year-old Ghislaine Maxwell told house guests her father beat her with objects of her choosing — and Jeffrey Epstein referred to Prince Andrew as his useful “idiot,” according to an explosive upcoming book about the British royal family.
Excerpts from author Tina Brown’s “The Palace Papers: Inside the House of Windsor — the Truth and the Turmoil,” published Monday in the Daily Telegraph, tell how Epstein, a New York financier, used his relationship with the prince to open doors in international circles and further enrich himself.
The book, on shelves in two weeks, also explores how Maxwell’s unorthodox upbringing as the privileged daughter of media mogul and fraudster Robert Maxwell helped shape her twisted relationship with the convicted sex predator.
The child abuse claims in “The Palace Papers” are attributed to a British newspaper heiress who knew Maxwell as a girl.
“(Eleanor) Berry noticed an odd-shaped hairbrush, a strap, a slipper and other implements laid out on the child’s dressing room table. Ghislaine said, rather proudly, ‘(This) is what daddy uses to beat me with. But he always allows me to choose which one I want,’” reads the excerpt... Source
And of course, Robert Maxwell has also been publicly accused of being a paedophile… Certainly he would have been the man to introduce his daughter to Jeffery Epstein, whom helped Rob the Blob siphon off millions of Pounds from the Daily Mirror pension funds.
17) Christopher Exley, convicted of possessing child abuse images
Exley, who worked as a Police Protection Officer to the [not so] Royal family was convicted of possessing child porn in 2012:
A serving policeman who works in the Met’s Special Operations division, which protects the Royal Family, has admitted downloading child porn.
Christopher Exley, 33, faces jail after an illegal stash of pictures was found on his computer when his home in Clapton, east London was raided in February this year… Source
18) Michael Fawcett, rape allegation
Now this rape allegation names the victim as being George Smith – A valet to the then Prince Charles – whilst Fawcet (the alleged perpetrator) was listed as being a Private Consultant to Big Ears:
He never likes being away too long from Highgrove and his beloved garden. But as the Prince of Wales flies home from the Gulf tomorrow, he will probably be wishing he were somewhere else, anywhere but at the mercy of television cameras and shrieking headlines.
And why prey tell would that be, I hear you ask yourselves?
To which the answer would be; because of a moment of madness on behalf of Prince Buggerlugs’ then Private Secretary, Sir Michael Peat:
That moment was when Sir Michael Peat, an accountant by trade who works for the Prince as private secretary, had the brilliant idea that the best way to stem the gossip was to ‘go public’.
The gossip, in fact, had been restricted to a few hundred people at best, and the ‘senior royal’ had not been named in private court proceedings over an injunction obtained by Charles’s former personal consultant Michael Fawcett to prevent claims by another servant being published.
He (Peat) revealed that the royal in question was Prince Charles and said that the ‘rumour’ (rape allegation) was nonsense. He knew it was nonsense, he declared, because ‘the Prince of Wales has told me it is untrue and I believe him implicitly’… Source
And of course, the King would never lie… Would he?
Moreover, Fawcett was one of those alleged by the foreign press to have had an affair with Charles:
The sex scandal surrounding Prince Charles continued to build Monday, as reports said he had decided not to go on TV to deny the rumors, and a former servant came to his defense.
Though a court order kept English media from reporting just what the scandal’s about, no such order applied to newspapers elsewhere. Newspapers from Scotland and Italy to Australia reported the central allegations: that George Smith, a former valet to Prince Charles, says he saw the prince having sex with another male aide, Michael Fawcett; and that Fawcett had raped Smith… Source
Yet apparently our new Kink still misses his alleged former lover:
But of course, this recent farticle makes no mention whatsoever of those rape claims. It does however include some very interesting observations:
It wasn’t supposed to be like this. For much of his professional life, which spanned almost four decades, Fawcett was being groomed for a key role in the court of Charles III...
For Charles, this amounts to a personal as well as professional tragedy. ‘I can manage without just about anyone, except for Michael,’ was how he once famously summed up their intimate if eventually doomed working relationship...
‘Michael knew where all the bodies were buried at the Palace, who knew the secrets, who they would need and who, more importantly, they could discard,’ says a long-term associate. ‘He’d been there for 41 years and knew everything and everyone.’
19) Reginald Forester-Smith, convicted of sustained child abuse involving his two daughters
The wealthy society photographer was jailed for eight years in 1999 for subjecting his two daughters – and another schoolgirl – to a sustained, systematic campaign of sexual abuse… Source
Forester-Smith is listed as being commissioned to photograph Liz & Phil and his crimes once again reinforce what I say about these sick-fucks subjecting their offspring to unimaginable horrific childhoods… Course, you do not get commissioned to photograph the royal family unless you are invited to.
And as a final slap in the face, the sick-fuck nonce Millionaire did not leave his sexually abused daughters anything in his will, but did bequeath £400,000 to the Girl Guides… Cunt!
20) Lord Justice Fulford, founder member of a campaign to defend the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE)
Predictably, Fulford was not only knighted by the Queen but was named as an adviser to her in 2013… Imagine that!
21) Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, child abuse allegation
Princess Andrew was known to have dined with the Libyan Dictator on a number of occasions and it was in fact the nonces bizarre ties to the North African country that eventually brought Randy-Andy’s prized role as UK trade envoy crashing down around his royal ears – Source
And of course, birds of a feather and all that isreinforced by the fact that Gadaffi was also a nonce:
The ousted Libyan dictator Colonel Gaddafi kidnapped and raped hundreds of teenagers in specially built sex dungeons, according to a television documentary to be screened by the BBC next week... Source
22) Viscount David Linley, blackmailed following sex allegations.
Now I did in fact publish an article back in 2012 which included details of these allegations… Here is what I wrote:
The following are extracts from an article written in 2007 by the royal researcher Jim Hutchinson in connection to Dirty Dave:
“David Linley has been named as the royal ‘puffta’ involved in a ‘sex and drugs’ blackmail case […] The member of the British royal family in an alleged blackmail plot has finally been outed.
The Queen’s nephew and so-called “Viscount” David Linley is the son of the late Princess Margaret. He cannot be identified in the British (Palace controlled) media, but has now been named on Australian and US television. Linley is “married” with two children, and poses as a “furniture designer”.
Property developer Ian Strachan, 30, and Sean McGuigan, 40, appeared at a London magistrates’ court on September 13 each charged with one count of blackmail. They were remanded in custody until December 20. The two men allegedly demanded £50,000, $NZ136,840, in return for returning tapes of Linley involved in a sex act with a palace flunky.
The Sunday Times were the first to report the alleged homosexual act. In telephone calls to Linley’s office in August, the alleged blackmailers also claimed to have proof that Linley supplied a servant with cocaine.
They claimed to have video footage of the servant snorting the drug.[…] According to The Sunday Times, it is the first published blackmail case involving a British royal in more than a century. In 1891, the future King Edward 7th paid off society prostitutes in return for pornographic letters he had sent them. The future King George 4th likewise used his Civil List to silence society prostitutes. The Duke of Wellington was made of sterner stuff. He famously told the girls to “publish and be dammed”.
Course, Princess Slaggy Maggies son is now also being lauded in the press as one of the seemingly many adored by our late Queen:
Fuck me, she loved every-fucking-body didn’t she?
Yet funnily enough, that article makes no mention whatsoever of Linley’s darker side.
23) Patrick Gilbert, The ‘friend of royalty’ was convicted of child sexual abuse offences
Now according to one of the other lists that I have seen:
Pervert Patrick Gilbert, a friend of Royalty, molested his victim for four years, after paying for him to have ballet lessons…[Gilbert]…has a previous conviction for molesting two 13-year-old boys…’
“Gilbert often met the Queen…at Palace garden parties”
However, once again I can find little information on Gilbert (fittingly the slang name for a bogey) but the following website link does list Gilbert as being a friend to the Royals.
24) Gary Goldsmith, pimp allegation
Goldsmith is of course the Uncle of our new Princess of Wales AKA Kate Gold-Digger Smiff And predictably, Uncle Gaz denies the allegations of being a drug dealer & a pimp:
But on the key allegations, he is clear: ‘I didn’t take drugs or pimp for anyone. I was asked if I knew where to find a hooker. All I said was I’d heard of a taxi driver who could help with anything they wanted on the island.’ He adds: ‘I did say I had a wing in Buckingham Palace, but that was a joke.’… Source
Course, whilst I suppose the pimping allegation is easy for Gazza to deny, it is telling that he also denied being a drug dealer despite being filmed by an undercover reporter, cutting up lines of Cocaine. The following is taken from an article published in 2009:
Prince William was last night forced to cut ties with Kate Middleton’s uncle after he was filmed giving hard drugs to an undercover reporter.
Goldsmith, 44, bragged about a holiday William and his niece had taken at his £5million villa on Ibiza before ‘chopping’ up lines of cocaine and offering to set the journalist up with high-class prostitutes… Source
PHOTO: Uncle Gary definitely not cutting up Cocaine for an undercover reporter.
25) Nicholas Greaves, convicted of child pornography
A FORMER royal butler has been jailed for two years for child pornography offences.
Nicholas Greaves, 33, of Crescent Avenue, in Whitby, North Yorkshire, had more than 450 indecent photos of children.
The former Buckingham Palace under-butler also had 15 indecent films of children stored on a laptop computer… Source
Yet no one seems overly concerned about the disproportionate number of nonces employed by the royal family!
26) Stuart Hall, child abuse allegations
Now I think it is safe to say that these are more than allegation since the nonce was sent to prison for assaulting three underage girls:
Ex-BBC broadcaster Stuart Hall has been sentenced to an extra two years and six months in prison for two counts of indecently assaulting a girl.
Hall, 84, from Wilmslow, Cheshire, will start the sentence after completing a 30-month term for similar offences.
He admitted indecently assaulting the girl when she was 13 and was found guilty of one count in a majority jury verdict at Preston Crown Court… Source
Hall became close to the Royals after various members of the family (including Princess Anne, Princess Andrew & Prick Edward) took part in his TV show: It’s A Knockout.
PHOTO: Hall camping it up with Randy Andy & Ed the Ball.
Predictably, prior to his conviction Hall was awarded an OBE by the Queen.
27) Rolf Harris, convicted child abuser
The nonce Harris (whom I publicly named as a paedo long before his arrest) was that close to Bizzy Lizzie that he was given the honour – if you can call it that – of painting her official portrait in 2005.
PHOTO: Sweaty Betty was so comfortable in the company of nonce Harris that she happily posed twice for him.
Incredibly, the Palace was warned about Harris, by one of his victims after it was announced that the predatory nonce had been commissioned to do the portrait:
“Rolf Harris guilty: Abuse victim wrote to the Queen to warn her as the presenter painted monarch’s portrait”… Source
Harris served 3 years in prison after being convicted of child sex abuse on 4 girls – the youngest of whom was only 13 yrs old at the time. He was also charged with sexually abusing an 8 yr old but managed to wriggle out of that one.
And like fellow BBC presenter, Stuart Hall, Rockin’ Rolf was also rewarded by the Queen who bestowed both an AO & a CBE on the Australian pervert – after first giving him an MBE followed by an OBE… She really did think highly of the cunt didn’t she?
Ironically, Harris was also accused of groping the bottom of a 14-year-old girl at a celebrity It’s a Knockout hosted by Stuart Hall.
Course, just like King Charles’ great friend – the sick fuck DJ, Jimmy Savile – Rolf Harris acted in plain sight having presented a twenty-minute child abuse prevention video called Kids Can Say No in 1985.
Moreover, “in 2004, as a part of the Rolf on Art series, Harris travelled to Lapland to design and paint a Christmas card for the “Children in Need” charity organisation“. Source: Wikipedia
But of course, Sweaty Betty didn’t have a Scooby-Fucking-Doo about Rolf’s perversions in the same way that she didn’t know about Jimmy saviles – despite him being on the police radar as far back as the 1950’s.
After all, those Security Service background checks – needed to get anywhere near the Queen – are very lax, don’t cha know.
28) Sir Peter Hayman. The recipient of a prestigious honor (the CVO) granted to him by the Queen acting in her personal capacity, Hayman was the subject of a child sexual abuse allegation
Now, according to Wikipedia:
“Sir Peter Telford Hayman KCMG CVO MBE (14 June 1914 – 6 April 1992) was a British diplomat, intelligence operative and member of the Paedophile Information Exchange“…
Or put another way, the dirty cunt was a sick nonce.
And once again, you will notice that the Queen furnished Hayman with an MBE, despite all recipients of these awards having first been thoroughly vetted by various government departments to make sure that they’re suitable for such an honour… But as I say, these Government background checks are very lax.
Ok, I am of course fucking with you because the Government’s Security Services hold vast files on the perverted activities of all these kiddie-fiddlers and there can be little doubt that the Queen also knows. Course that did not stop her awarding him a CVO which recognises distinguished personal service to the British monarch and is an honour granted by the Queen personally – unlike most awards given by the Sovereign on the recommendation of her Government.
Furthermore, Slaggy Maggie Thatcher certainly knew that Hayman was a nonce and ordered the fact to be covered up after the cunt was connected to a paedophile scandal which at the time was in danger of falling into the public domain:
Margaret Thatcher was adamant officials should not publicly name Sir Peter Hayman, a senior diplomat connected to a paedophile scandal, even after she had been fully briefed on his activities, examination of formerly secret papers released to the National Archives shows… Source
Course, Slaggy Maggie covered up for many nonces being as most of the MP’s in her Cabinet had a penchant for child sex… Not that Hayman was ever in any danger of being exposed since he was also a spy for MI5 – just sayin’.
Ugly cunt isn’t he?
And while I am on a roll, I will also point out that Thatcher was made aware of the fat-cunt MP Cyril Smith’s noncing before he was knighted by the Queen in 1988, yet she did fuck all to stop it:
However, I am sure that both Thatcher & Bizzy Lizzie knew all about Smith’s kiddy-fiddlin’ long before 1988… I mean there is a clear pattern opening up here is there not?
PHOTO: The fat cunt nonce MP Cyril Smith sat next to the weedy cunt nonce MP, Jeremy Thorpe
Course, never let it be said that Smith was a heartless child abuser since it has been said that he allowed the children he was raping to straddle him rather than crush them with his fat guts… Cunt.
29) Tony Aslett. The Buckingham Palace tour guide was arrested at the Palace and pleaded guilty to seven counts of making indecent images of children:
A Buckingham Palace tourist worker had more than 15,000 child sex abuse pictures and videos – including some as young as 18 months old.
Tony Aslett, from Pagham, West Sussex, was arrested at the Palace where he worked as a visitor services warden on April 27, 2015... Source
PHOTO: Tony Aslett
Yet despite all these members of the Queen’s staff turning out to be nonces, the plant pots are still unable to put 2 & 2 together!
30) Jean-Luc Brunel. The Frenchman who reportedly supplied trafficked girls or young women to Prince Andrew.
Course, Brunel – Like Epstein – conveniently committed suicide, although I very much doubt that either nonce did in reality:
A victim of Jeffrey Epstein‘s French modelling agent friend Jean-Luc Brunel, who was found dead today in an alleged prison suicide, has said it is ‘past time’ for Prince Andrew to ‘speak openly’ with the authorities.
Prosecutors in Paris confirmed Brunel, who is not believed to have been on suicide watch, was found hanging in his cell in La Santé, in the south of the capital Paris, in the early hours of Saturday morning.
PHOTO: Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein & Brunel
Of course and quite predictably, Princess Andrew declined to help the FBI investigation despite saying that he would do.
And if anyone is still in any doubt whatsoever that our alleged recently deceased ever-so-noble Queen protected her nonce son from being prosecuted, the national press are now publicly airing the fact:
And since that headline also states that Randy Andy will not be a part of Kink Chaz’s streamlined monarchy because he does not want to be “Affected By Scandals Past And Present“! Well all I can say to that is what a cunt, since in doing so old Big-Ears appears to be forgetting that he is in the forefront of most of those scandals.
Including that of Charles Hornby – a member of an upper-class paedophile ring:
Mr Charles Hornby, 36, Old Etonian, former Lancers officer, horse trainer and gentleman jockey – jailed for 12 months on conspiracy and gross indecency charges, and 18 months for attempting to pervert the course of justice... Source
I mean, not forgetting that our new King dined with both Jimmy Savile & Peter Ball, he also did the same with Hornby:
He [Hornby] was a Lloyds underwriter, and occasionally apparently had Prince Charles among his guests at his inherited country estate at Shipton Moyne, Tetbury in the Gloucestershire Cotswolds... Source
And once again, you have to wonder just how many nonce friends one has to have before people start to cotton on?
Furthermore, the newly crowned Queen Oldsort, Camilla Parker Horseface’s ex-husband, Andrew Parker Bowles is godfather to Hornby’s son. And of course, whilst Camilla spent many years of her first marriage having it off with old Buggerlugs, her husband Andrew was doing the same with Princess Anne… See, they like to keep the perversion within the family.
31) Benjamin Herman. Prince Philip’s royal aide (as he was at the time) is the subject of an allegation of child sexual abuse
“A former aide to the Duke of Edinburgh has appeared in court accused of sexually abusing a young girl in the early 1970s.
Benjamin Herman, 79, of Hook, Hampshire, spoke only to confirm his name as he stood in the dock at Kingston crown court on Monday. A date of 18 May 2015 was provisionally set for his trial at the same venue.
He is charged with three counts of indecent assault on a girl under the age of 14 and one of attempted indecent assault on a girl under 16.
They are alleged to have been carried out on a girl aged 12 in 1972 at a house in London used by military personnel, where Herman was living at the time.
Herman was a serving major in the Royal Marines at the time, on secondment as equerry – a personal assistant – to Prince Philip.
Imagine that! Phil the Ducks personal assistant was a nonce.
And, as I am sure that by now nothing will surprise you; I can tell you that Herman the Monster later went on to become Princess Anne’s Private Secretary.
Yet sadly, no matter how many of us document the perversions of this evil family and no matter how much proof we put forward, the plant-pots will never wake up to reality… Not as long as the wheels of the Monster Elites Propaganda Machine continue to turn, that is for sure.